Adultos diante do bullying escolar na série Thirteen reasons why:  uma análise bioecológica

Karen Yukari Kimura; Manoel Antônio  dos Santos; Eduardo Name Risk; Marta Angélica Iossi Silva; Wanderlei Abadio de Oliveira

doi:10.22235/cp.v16i2.2713

Authors

Karen Yukari Kimura Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9335-4104
Manoel Antônio dos Santos Universidade de São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9967-8158
Eduardo Name Risk Universidade Federal de São Carlos https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7290-2597
Marta Angélica Iossi Silva Universidade de São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9967-8158
Wanderlei Abadio de Oliveira Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3146-8197

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v16i2.2713

Keywords:

bullying, school violence, adolescents, audiovisual data, victimization

Abstract

School bullying is a serious public health problem and television drama series can contribute to shedding more light on its numerous facets. Hence, this study sought to analyze the discourses and practices of adults when they learn about or witness bullying situations in the television series Thirteen Reasons Why. This exploratory study employed a qualitative approach based on Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological Theory. The methodological procedures comprised analyzing and selecting the episodes, identifying the scenes that contained bullying, classifying the adults’ perspectives and actions, and data analysis. We found an insufficient understanding of the adults in situations of bullying that were witnessed or known. Coercive behaviors, punishments, and transference of responsibility between contexts were the most identified actions. This study contributes to raising awareness among managers and civil society about the role of adults in managing and preventing cases of bullying in schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahtola, A., Haataja, A., Kärnä, A., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). For children only? Effects of the KiVa antibullying program on teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 851-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.006

Analisah, C. D. C. & Indartono, S. (2019). Ecological Theory: preventing student bullying to promote culture of peace. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 323, 239-244. https://doi.org/10.2991/icossce-icsmc-18.2019.44

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Costa, K. M. R. & Miranda, C. E. S. (2020). Associação entre bullying escolar e suicídio: uma revisão integrativa da literatura. Cadernos Brasileiros e Saúde Mental, 12(31), 312-327. https://doi.org/10.5007/cbsm.v12i31.69815

Fung, A. L. (2012). Intervention for aggressive victims of school bullying in Hong Kong: a longitudinal mixed-methods study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53(4), 360-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00953.x

Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2021). What works in anti-bullying programs? Analysis of effective intervention components. Journal of school psychology, 85, 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.002

Kollerová L., Soukup P., Strohmeier D., & Caravita S. C. S. (2021). Teachers’ active responses to bullying: Does the school collegial climate make a difference? European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(6), 912-927. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1865145

Levinzon, G. K. (2018). Thirteen reasons why: suicídio em adolescentes. Jornal de Psicanálise, 51(95), 297-306.

Moore, S. E., Norman, R. E., Suetani, S., Thomas, H. J., Sly, P. D., & Scott, J. G. (2017). Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Psychiatry, 7(1), 60-76. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v7.i1.60

Oliveira, W. A., Silva, J. L., Fernandez, J. E. R., Santos, M. A., Caravita, S. C. S., & Silva, M. A. I. (2020). Family interactions and the involvement of adolescents in bullying situations from a bioecological perspective. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 37, e180094. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202037e180094

Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 751-780. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516

Ribeiro, C. N. & Guerra, A. M. C. (2020). Adolescência, atos e o risco de suicídio. Psicologia USP, 31, e190108. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6564e190108

Rivara, F. & Le Menestrel, S. (Eds.). (2016). Preventing bullying through science, policy, and practice. National Academies Press.

Senna, S. R. C. M. & Dessen, M. A. (2012). Contribuições das teorias do desenvolvimento humano para a concepção contemporânea da adolescência. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 28(1), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-37722012000100013

Silva, J. L., Oliveira, W. A., Bazon, M. R., & Cecílio, S. (2014). Bullying: conhecimentos, atitudes e crenças de professores. Psico, 45(2), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2014.2.12683

Silva, N. D. & Rodrigues, R. F. L. (2020). The importance of the school psychologist: A look at the “13 reasons why” series. Research, Society and Development, 9(9), e409997361.

United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2019). Violência escolar e bullying: Relatório sobre a situação mundial. Representação da UNESCO no Brasil.

Zequinão, M. A., Medeiros, P. de; Pereira, B., & Cardoso, F. L. (2016). Bullying escolar: Um fenômeno multifacetado. Educação e Pesquisa, 42(1), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-9702201603138354

Zequinão, M. A., Medeiros, P., Silva, J. L., Pereira, B. O., & Cardoso, F. L. (2020). Sociometric status of participants involved in school bullying. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 30, e3011. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3011