Nuevas evidencias de validez para el Inventario de Estrategias de Afrontamiento
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v14i2.2319Palabras clave:
evaluación psicológica, afrontamiento, psicología positiva, educación superior, psicometríaResumen
El objetivo del presente estudio fue analizar las propiedades psicométricas del Inventario de Estrategias de Afrontamiento (IEC) mediante las evidencias de validez basadas en la estructura interna y en la relación con otras variables (fortalezas de carácter). Participaron 927 estudiantes universitarios, con una edad media de 26 años (DE= 7.7), la mayoría eran mujeres. Todos respondieron al Inventario de Estrategias de Afrontamiento y la Escala de Fuerzas de Carácter (EFC). Después de analizar los datos, se sugiere una nueva organización factorial de cuatro factores, a partir de los ocho iniciales. Los factores son: Reevaluación positiva (α= .79), Retraimiento y aceptación (α= .79), Apoyo social (α= .67) y Confrontación y resolución de problemas (α= .86). Los puntajes del IEC se correlacionaron con los puntajes EFC, mostrando que la nueva estructura factorial encontrada presenta evidencias de validez basadas en relaciones con otras variables. Los resultados se discuten a la luz de la literatura.
Descargas
Citas
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA, APA, & NMCE). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, EUA: American Educational Research Association.
Ben-Zur H. (2019) Transactional Model of Stress and Coping. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. Shackelford (Orgs.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1-4). Cham, Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2128-1
Borsa, J. C., & Seize, M. M. (2017). Construção e adaptação de instrumentos psicológicos. In B. F. Damásio & J. C. Borsa (Orgs), Manual de desenvolvimento de instrumentos psicológicos (pp. 21-43). São Paulo, SP: Vetor.
Bramsen, I., Bleiker, E., Eveline, M. A., Triemstra, A. H., Mattanja, Van-Rossum, Sandra M. G. et al. (1995). A Dutch adaptation of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire: Factor stucture and psychometric properties. Anxiety. Stress and Coping an International Journal, 8(4), 337-352.
Corti, E. J., Johnson, A. R., Gasson, N., Bucks, R. S., Thomas, M. G., & Loftus, A. M. (2018). Factor Structure of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire in Parkinson’s Disease. Parkinson’s Disease, 2018, 1-7. doi:10.1155/2018/7128069.
Coyne, J. C., Aldwin, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Depression and coping in stressful episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 439-447.
Damásio, B. F. (2012). Uso da análise fatorial exploratória em psicologia. Avaliação Psicológica, 11(2), 213–228.
Dinis, A., Gouveia, J., & Duarte, C. (2011). Contributos para a Validação da Versão Portuguesa do Questionário de Estilos de Coping. Psychologica, 1(1), 35-62.
Falkum, E., Oiff, M, & Aasland, O. (1997). Revisiting the factor structure of the Ways of Coping Checklist: a three-dimensional view of the problem-focused coping scale. A study among Norwegian physicians. Personality and Individual Differences, 22(2), 257-267.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of health and social behavior, 21(3), 219-239.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: A study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170.
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Gruen, R., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 571-579.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Manual for the ways of coping questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Gloria, C. T., & Steinhardt, M. A. (2016) Relationships among positive emotions, coping, resilience and mental health. Stress Health, 32(2), 145-156. doi: 10.1002/smi.2589
Greenaway, K. H., Louis, W. R., Parker, S. L., Kalokerinos, E. K., Smith, J. R., & Terry, D. J. (2015). Measures of Coping for Psychological Well-Being. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, 1, 322-351. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386915-9.00012-7
Gustems-Carnicer, J., & Calderón, C. (2016). Virtues and character strengths related to approach coping strategies of college students. Social Psychology of Education, 19(1), 77-95.
Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2015). The relationships of character strengths with coping, work-related stress, and job satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 165. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00165.
Hirsch, C. D., Barlem, E. L. D., Almeida, L. K. D., Tomaschewski-Barlem, J. G., Figueira, A. B., & Lunardi, V. L. (2015). Estratégias de coping de acadêmicos de enfermagem diante do estresse universitário. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 68(5), 783-790.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new99 alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Lazarus R. S., & Folkman S. (1984a). Stress appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
Lazarus R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984b). Coping and Adaptation. Em W. D. Gentry (Org.), Handbook of Behavioral Medicine (pp. 282-325). New York: The Guilford Press.
Lazarus, R. S., & Smith, C. A. (1988). Knowledge and appraisal in the cogmtton-emotion relationship. Cognition and Emotion, 2, 281-300.
Ledesma, R. D., Ferrando, P. J., & Tosi, J. D. (2019). Uso del Análisis Factorial Exploratorio en RIDEP. Recomendaciones para Autores y Revisores. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 52(3), 173-180. doi: 10.21865/RIDEP52.3.13
Levin, J., & Fox, J. A. (2004). Estatística para ciências humanas. São Paulo, SP: Pearson.
Liew, C. V., Santoro, M. S., Edwards, L., Kang, J., & Cronan, T. A. (2016). Assessing the Structure of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire in Fibromyalgia Patients Using Common Factor Analytic Approaches. Pain research & management, 2016, 7297826. doi:10.1155/2016/7297826
Lipp, M. E. N. (1984). Manual do Inventário de Sintomas de Stress para Adultos de Lipp (ISSL). São Paulo, SP: Casa do Psicólogo.
Luca, L., Noronha, A. P. P., & Queluz, F. N. F. R. (2018). Relações entre estratégias de coping e adaptabilidade acadêmica em estudantes universitários. Revista Brasileira de Orientação Profissional, 19(2), 169-176. doi: 1026707/1984-7270/2019v19n2p169
Marôco, J. (2014). Análise estatística com o SPSS statistics. Pêro Pinheiro, Portugal: Report Number.
Noronha, A. P. P., Dellazzana-Zanon, L. L., & Zanon C. (2015). Internal Structure of the Strengths and Virtues Scale in Brazil. Psico-USF, 20(2), 229-235. doi:10.1590/1413-82712015200204
Noronha, A. P. P., & Barbosa, A. J. G. (2016). Forças e Virtudes: Escala de Forças de caráter. In C. S. Hutz (Org.), Avaliação em Psicologia Positiva: Técnicas e Medidas (pp. 21-43). São Paulo: CETEPP.
Pais-Ribeiro, J., & Santos, C. (2001). Estudo conservador de adaptação do Ways of Coping Questionnaire a uma amostra e contexto portugueses. Análise Psicológica, 19(4), 491-502.
Park, S. A., & Sung, K. M. (2016) Effects on Stress, Problem Solving Ability and Quality of Life of as a Stress Management Program for Hospitalized Schizophrenic Patients: Based on the Stress, Appraisal-Coping Model of Lazarus & Folkman. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 46(4), 583-597. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2016.46.4.583
Savóia, M. G., Santana, P. R., & Mejias, N. P. (1996). Adaptação do Inventário de Estratégias de Coping de Folkman e Lazarus para o português. Psicologia USP, 7(1), 183-201.
Seider, S., Jayawickreme, E., & Lerner, J. V. (2017). Theoretical and Empirical Bases of Character Development in Adolescence: A View of the Issues. Journal of youth and adolescence. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0650-3
Vitaliano, P.P., Russo, J., Can, J. E., Maiuro, R.D., & Becker, J. (1985). Ways of Coping Checklist: Revision and psychometric properties. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 3-26. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2001_1.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Universidad Católica del Uruguay
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.