Hope and fear: a theoretical approach to the emotions in political communication

Authors

  • Raquel Tarullo Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22235/d.v0i25.1271

Keywords:

emotion, reason, political communication, affective intelligence, social media

Abstract

The Western philosophy postulates present reason and emotion as antagonistic forces that motivate individuals in their everyday decision making. In the Western culture, reason has had to dominate emotion so as to reach objective decisions. Habermas hypothesis about the rational dimension of the public sphere reaffirms this tendency that states the public domain should find an order based on rational principles. Although rationalism is still predominant among Social Science researchers, a change in the approaches is evident: emotions have begun to be included in studies when the comprehension of contemporary phenomenon is necessary. Particularly, in the political communication field, emotion as a topic of exploration is new. However, new disciplinary perspectives allow innovating in research inquiries. The aim of this article is to examine literature about the main postulates of the Affective Intelligence Theory which, with Neuroscience, offer other perspectives to the political communication field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amado, A. (2013). La épica no es fiesta [El drama como estilo de comunicación del gobierno argentino]. Perspectivas, 8, 2–6.

Aruguete, N. y Riorda, M. (2014). ¿Ideología u homogeneización? un análisis de las campañas electorales de Argentina, México y Venezuela. Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública, 16, 31–49.

Banning, S. y Coleman, R. (2009). Louder than words. Visual Communication Quaterly, 16, 4–17.

Bennett, W. (2012). The Personalization of Politics: Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39. http://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428

Bennett, W. L. (1998). The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. P&S: Political Science & Politics, 31(4), 740–761.

Bennett, W. L., e Iyengar, S. (2008). A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x

Blumler, J. G., y Gurevitch, M. (1995). The Crisis of Public Communication [Versión Kindle]. London: Routledge.

Blumler, J. G., y Kavanagh, D. (1999). The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209–230. http://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596

Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 388–405. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x

Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for Hearts and Minds, How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Castells, M. (2008). Comunicación, poder y contrapoder en la sociedad red (I). Los medios y la política. Telos: Cuadernos de Comunicación e Innovación, 74, 13–24. Recuperado de http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2545714

Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder. Barcelona: Alianza.

Castells, M. (2012). Redes de indignación y esperanza. Los movimientos sociales en la era de internet. Barcelona: Alianza.

Chaffee, S. y Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13 (1), 76-107.

Coleman, R. y Wu, H. D. (2010). Visual Cues in the Formation of Affect. Coleman, R. y Wu, H. D. (Eds.). Image and Emotion in Voter Decisions: The Affect Agenda. London: Lexington Books.

Dahlgren, P. (2012). Tracking the Civic Subject in the Media Landscape: Versions of the Democratic Ideal. Television & New Media, 14 (1), 71–88. http://doi.org/10.1177/1527476412458809

Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes`s Error. New York: Avon Books. http://doi.org/10.7202/051028ar

Damasio, A. (2007). En busca de Spinoza. España: Drakontos.

Dang-Xuan, L., Stieglitz, S., Wladarsch, J. y Neuberger, C. (2013). An Investigation of Influentials and the Role of Sentiment in Political Communication on Twitter During Election Periods. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 795–825. http://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.783608

Espinosa Pezzia, A. (2008). Decidiéndose por el mal menor: El rol de las emociones en las elecciones peruanas del 2006. Psicología Política, 37, 47–70.

Eveland, W. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21 (2), 177-193.

García Beaudoux, V., D’Adamo, O. y Slavinsky, G. (2011). Propaganda gubernamental. Tácticas e iconografías del poder. Buenos Aires: La Crujía.

Gutiérrez-Rubí, A. (2009). Micropolítica: Ideas para cambiar la comunicación política. Recuperado de http://www.gutierrez-rubi.es/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/libro_micropolitica.pdf

Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. y Apson, R. (1994). Emotional Contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Iyengar, S. y Kinder, D. (1987). News that matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Jerit, J. (2004). Survival of the Fittest: Rethoric during the Course of an Election Cam- paign. Political Psicology, 25, 563–575.

Just, M., Crigler, A. y Belt, T. (2007). “Don´t give up hope”. Emotions, Candidate, Appraisal and Votes. Marcus, G. E., Russell, N. W., Mackuen, M. y Crigler, A. (Eds.). The affect effect, dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 231-259). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Katz, E. y Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. Nueva York: The Free Press.

Lakoff, G. (2007). No pienses en un elefante: lenguaje y debate político. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.

Lang, A. (1994). How they predict memory for Television Messages. Presentado en el Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Atlanta, Estados Unidos.

Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50, 46–70. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x

LeDoux, J. (1996). The Emotional Brain. London: Phoenix.

López-Escobar, E. y Llamas, J. P. (1996). Agenda-setting: investigaciones sobre el primer y el segundo nivel. Comunicación y Sociedad, 9 (2), 9–15.

Marcus, G. E. (2002). The Sentimental Citizen, Emotion in Democratic Politics. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Marcus, G., Neuman, R. y Mackuen, M. (2000). Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

McCombs, M. y Shaw, D. (1974, agosto). A Progress Report on Agenda-setting Research. Paper presentado en la reunión anual de la Association for Education in Journalism, San Diego, CA.

Miller, J. M. (2007). Examining the Mediators of Agenda-Setting: A New Experimental Paradigm Reveals the Role of Emotions. International Society of Political Psychology, 28(6), 689–717.

Moy, P. y Gastil, J. (2006). Predicting Deliberative Conversation: The Impact of Discussion Networks, Media Use, and Political Cognitions. Political Communication, 23(4), 443–460. http://doi.org/10.1080/10584600600977003

Plummer, K. (2003). Intimate Citizenship. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Reese, S. D. (2001). Framing Public Life: A Bridging Model for Media Research. Reese, S., Gandy, O. y Grant, A. (Eds.). Framing Public Life: A Bridging Model for Media Research (pp. 7–31). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Rincón, O. (2011). Mucho ciberactivismo... pocos votos. Nueva Sociedad, 235, 74–89. Recuperado de http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/nuso/nuso-235.pdf

Rincón, O., y Bonilla, J. I. (2004). Comunicación Política en América Latina. Bogotá: Centro de Competencia en Comunicación para América Latina. Recuperado de http://www.fesmedia-latin-america.org/uploads/media/Comunicaci%C3%B3n_pol%C3%ADtica_en_Am%C3%A9rica_Latina.pdf

Russell, N. W., Marcus, G., Crigler, A. y Mackuen, M. (2007). Affect Effect. Dynamics of emotion in polititical thinking and behaviour. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4), 695–729. http://doi.org/10.1177/0539018405058216

Stieglitz, S. y Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media—Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217–248. http://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408

Valentino, N., Hutchings, T., Banks, A. y Davis, A. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psicology, 29 (2), 247-273.

Valenzuela, S. (2011). The Affective Citizen Communication Model: How Emotions Engage Citizens with Politics through Media and Discussion. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 198. Recuperado de http://search.proquest.com/docview/906381170

Westen, D. (2008). The emotional brain. New York: Public Affairs.

Wolton, D. (2005). Elogio del gran público. Buenos Aires: Gedisa.

Published

2016-12-01

How to Cite

Tarullo, R. (2016). Hope and fear: a theoretical approach to the emotions in political communication. Dixit, (25), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.22235/d.v0i25.1271

Issue

Section

Desde la Academia

Similar Articles

<< < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.