Propiedades psicométricas de los instrumentos de medición de la agencia: una revisión sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v17i2.2706Palabras clave:
agencia, agencia personal, propiedades psicométricas, instrumentos de medidaResumen
La capacidad de agencia, relacionada con la percepción de protagonismo en la toma de decisiones sobre la propia vida, presenta un historial de investigaciones basadas en estudios empíricos, pero aún existen incertidumbres conceptuales y de medición del fenómeno en las que se hacen simplificaciones y generalizaciones del concepto. Teniendo esto en cuenta, el objetivo de esta revisión sistemática de la literatura es analizar las propiedades psicométricas de los instrumentos de medición de la agencia personal. Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica sistemática con búsquedas en seis bases de datos brasileñas e internacionales hasta 2020. De los 55 documentos analizados, se identificaron 23 instrumentos con esta propuesta. Se observaron debilidades en cuanto a la robustez de las propiedades psicométricas presentadas, ya que la mayoría se limita a la validez de la estructura interna. La validez convergente y divergente son poco exploradas. No se identificó un instrumento de medición de agencia que tenga validez estadística para el contexto brasileño, ya que solo se encontró un instrumento con validación semántica. El desarrollo de un instrumento adaptado al contexto brasileño es la principal recomendación para futuros estudios.
Descargas
Citas
Abele, A. E., Uchronski, M., Suitner, C., & Wojciszke, B. (2008). Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1202-1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.575
Alkire, S. (2005). Subjective quantitative studies of human agency. Social Indicators Research, 74(1), 217-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6525-0
Baker, C. W., Little, T. D., & Brownell, K. D. (2003). Predicting adolescent eating and activity behaviors: the role of social norms and personal agency. Health Psychology, 22(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.2.189
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215
Besta, T., Mattingly, B., & Błażek, M. (2015). When membership gives strength to act: Inclusion of the group into the self and feeling of personal agency. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156(1), 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1053838
Betz, N. E. (1987). Use of discriminant analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(4), 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.393
Bosak, J., Sczesny, S., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Communion and agency judgments of women and men as a function of role information and response format. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1148-1155. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.538
Campbell, W. K., Bosson, J. K., Goheen, T. W., Lakey, C. E., & Kernis, M. H. (2007). Do narcissists dislike themselves ‘deep down inside?’ Psychological Science, 18(3), 227-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01880.x
Cauce, A. M. & Gordon, E. W. (2012). Toward the measurement of human agency and the disposition to express it. Gordon commission on the future of educational assessment, Princeton, Educational Testing Service. https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/cauce_gordon_measurement_human_agency.pdf
Chen, C. P. & Hong, J. W. L. (2020). The Career Human Agency Theory. Journal of Counseling & Development, 99(2), 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12313
Côté, I. M., Darling, E. S., & Brown, C. J. (2016). Interactions among ecosystem stressors and their importance in conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1824), 20152592. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2592
Côté, J. (1997). An empirical test of the identity capital model. Journal of Adolescence, 20(5), 577-597. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1997.0111
Dressler, W. W., Balieiro, M. C., & dos Santos, J. E. (2019). Agência, consonância cultural e sintomas depressivos: um exemplo brasileiro. Ethos, 47(2), 148-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/etho.12238
Fontes, A. P., Neri, A. L., & Yassuda, M. S. (2010). Enfrentamento de estresse no trabalho: relações entre idade, experiência, autoeficácia e agência. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 30(3), 620-633. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-98932010000300013
Ford, M. E. & Chase, C. (1991). Manual: Assessment of Personal Agency Beliefs. Stanford University.
Friestad, C. & Skog Hansen, I. L. (2010). Gender differences in inmates’ anticipated desistance. European Journal of Criminology, 7(4), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370810363375
Gai, M. J. P., Viseu, J. N. R., Cruz, R. M., & Kaczam, F. (no prelo). Perspectivas teóricas dos estudos sobre agency: uma revisão integrativa. Estudos de Psicologia.
Graff, M. (2016). Cognitive and affective aspects of personality and academic procrastination: The role of personal agency, flow, & executive function. [Tese de doutorado, City University of New York]. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2489&context=gc_etds
Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8a ed.). Cengage.
Henderson, S. J. (2002). The correlates of inventor motivation, creativity and achievement. [Tese de doutorado, Stanford University]. Stanford University ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/docview/305543449?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
International Test Commission. (2014). ITC guidelines on quality control in scoring, test analysis, and reporting of test scores. International Journal of Testing, 14(3), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.918040
Jesus, C. A., Preto, L. A., Ferreira, B. F., & Vicente, M. F. K. (2020). Estereótipos de gênero e seus impactos na psique humana. Revista Científica Sophia, 1(1), 70-87.
Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125
Landes, S. D. & Settersten Jr, R. A. (2019). The inseparability of human agency and linked lives. Advances in Life Course Research, 42, 100306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2019.100306
Lautamo, T., Paltamaa, J., Moilanen, J., & Malinen, K. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Assessment Tool for Perceived Agency (ATPA-22): utility for the rehabilitation of young adults not in education, employment or training (NEETs). Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28(2) 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2020.1782983
Lawson, K. M. & Lips, H. M. (2014). The role of self‐perceived agency and job attainability in women's impressions of successful women in masculine occupations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(6), 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12236
Lee, B., Porfeli, E. J., & Hirschi, A. (2016). Between-and within-person level motivational precursors associated with career exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.009
Little, T. D. & Wanner, B. (1997). The Multi-CAM: A multidimensional instrument to assess children’s action-control motives, beliefs, and behaviors (Materialien aus der Bildungsforschung Nr. 59). Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Education.
Little, T. D., Oettingen, G., & Baltes, P. B. (1995). The revised Control, Agency, and Means-ends Interview (CAMI): A multicultural validity assessment using mean and covariance (MACS) analyses (Materialen aus der Bildungsforschung, 49). Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Education.
Lundquist, S. (2015). Impact of gender, perception of being overweight and fat acceptance on personal agency: Establishing additional validity and reliability for the personal agency questionnaire. Alliant International University.
Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Bouter, L. M., Vet, H. C. W. de, & Terwee, C. B. (2016). The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 20(2), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology, 18(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Pacico, J. C. & Hutz, C. S. (2015). Validade. Em C. Hutz, C., Bandeira, D.R., & Trentini, C.M. (Orgs.), Psicometria (pp. 71-84). Artmed.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(n71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pasquali, L. (2003). Teoria da medida. Em L. Pasquali (2017). Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação (pp. 23-51). Vozes.
Pasquali, L. (2007). Validade dos testes psicológicos: será possível reencontrar o caminho? Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa, 23(spe), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Pick, S., Sirkin, J., Ortega, I., Osorio, P., Martínez, R., Xocolotzin, U., & Givaudan, M. (2007). Escala para medir Agencia Personal y Empoderamiento (ESAGE). Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 41(3), 295-304.
Polit, D. F. (2015). Assessing measurement in health: Beyond reliability and validity. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(11), 1746-1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.07.002
Primi, R. (2012). Psicometria: fundamentos matemáticos da Teoria Clássica dos Testes. Avaliação Psicológica, 11(2), 297-307.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
Rouse, K. A. G. & Austin, J. T. (2002). The relationship of gender and academic performance to motivation: Within-ethnic-group variations. The Urban Review, 34(4), 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021392000533
Runge, T. E., Frey, D., Gollwitzer, P. M., Helmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. (1981). Masculine (instrumental) and feminine (expressive) traits: A comparison between students in the United States and West Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 12, 142-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022181122002
Smith, G. C., Kohn, S. J., Savage-Stevens, S. E., Finch, J. J., Ingate, R., & Lim, Y.-O. (2000). The effects of interpersonal and personal agency on perceived control and psychological well-being in adulthood. The Gerontologist, 40(4), 458-468. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/40.4.458
Smith, G. C., Savage-Stevens, S., Kohn, S. J., Ingate, R., Finch, J., & Moon, Y. L. (1999). Creation and validation of scales measuring agency beliefs in adulthood. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
Souza, A. C. D., Alexandre, N. M. C., & Guirardello, E. D. B. (2017). Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validade. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, 26(3), 649-659. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022
Spence, J. T. & Helmreich, R. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. University of Texas Press.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting-out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1673-1682. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1673
Vallacher, R. R. & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 57(4), 660-671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.660
Vianna, H. M. (1983). Validade de construto em testes educacionais. Educação e Seleção, (8), 35-44.
Vidrine, J. I., Businelle, M. S., Cinciripini, P., Li, Y., Marcus, M. T., Waters, A. J., Reitzel, L. R., & Wetter, D. W. (2009). Associations of mindfulness with nicotine dependence, withdrawal, and agency. Substance Abuse, 30(4), 318-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897070903252973
Weaver, J. B. & Sargent, S. L. (2007). Gender role inventory. Em R. A. Reynolds, R. Woods, & J. B. Baker (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Electronic Surveys and Measurements (pp. 367-370). Idea Group Reference/IGA Global.
Wojciszke, B. & Szlendak, M. A. (2010). Skale do pomiaru orientacji sprawczej i wspólnotowej. Psychologia Społeczna, 5(1), 57-70.
Yoon, H. J. (2011). The development and validation of the assessment of human agency employing Albert Bandura’s human agency theory. [Tese de doutorado, The Pennsylvania State University]. The Pennsylvania State University. https://www.proquest.com/docview/902174568?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
Zanon, C. & Hauck Filho, N. H. (2015). Fidedignidade. Em C. Hutz, C., Bandeira, D.R., & Trentini, C.M. (Orgs.), Psicometria (pp. 85-96). Artmed.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Universidad Católica del Uruguay
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Se ceden los derechos de reproducción del artículo según la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), sistema de acceso abierto.
