Traducción y adaptación de la Level of Personal Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0

Christian Schetsche

doi:10.22235/cp.v15i2.2387

Autores

Christian Schetsche Universidad de Buenos Aires https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6353-3571

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v15i2.2387

Palavras-chave:

nível de funcionamento da personalidade, análise fatorial confirmatória, tradução, adaptação

Resumo

A quinta edição do Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais (DSM-5) introduziu o conceito de níveis de funcionamento da personalidade, que indicam a gravidade do transtorno da personalidade. Tanto quanto sabemos, não existem instrumentos psicométricos concisos para avaliar o nível de funcionamento da personalidade na língua espanhola, pelo que o objetivo deste estudo consistiu na tradução e adaptação da Level of Personal Functioning Scale – Brief Form 2.0. A amostra (N = 361) foi coletada via internet. Os resultados da análise fatorial confirmatória mostraram que o instrumento possui uma estrutura bifatorial e que pode ser utilizado, para além das suas duas dimensões, autofuncionamento e funcionamento interpessoal, com um fator que representa o funcionamento geral. As consistências internas obtiveram valores aceitáveis, e na análise da validade convergente foram encontradas correlações significativas com todos os traços de personalidade.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 40(7), 64-65.

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic criteria from dsM-iV-tr. American Psychiatric Pub.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.

Bach, B., & Hutsebaut, J. (2018). Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0: Utility in Capturing Personality Problems in Psychiatric Outpatients and Incarcerated Addicts. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 660-670. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1428984

Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a Model for Assessing Level of Personality Functioning in DSM–5, Part I: A Review of Theory and Methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 332-346. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.583808

Bernstein, R. F. (1998). Reconceptualizing Personality Disorder Diagnosis in the DSM-V : The Discriminant Validity Challenge. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5(3), 333-343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00153.x

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. New York: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421

Calabrese, W. R., & Simms, L. J. (2014). Prediction of daily ratings of psychosocial functioning: Can ratings of personality disorder traits and functioning be distinguished? Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(3), 314-322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000071

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2° Ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Recuperado de https://www.r-project.org/

Costello, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868

de la Parra, G., Undurraga, C., Crempien, C., Valdés, C., Dagnino, P., & Gómez-Barris, E. (2018). Estructura de Personalidad en Pacientes con Depresión: Adaptación de un Instrumento y Resultados Preliminares. Psykhe, 27(2), 1-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.27.2.1133

Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399-412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046

Ehrenthal, J., Dinger, U., Horsch, L., Komo-Lang, M., Klinkerfuß, M., Grande, T., & Schauenburg, H. (2012). Der OPD-Strukturfragebogen (OPD-SF): Erste Ergebnisse zu Reliabilität und Validität. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 62(01), 25-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1295481

Ehrenthal, J., Dinger, U., Schauenburg, H., Horsch, L., Dahlbender, R. W., & Gierk, B. (2015). Entwicklung einer Zwölf-Item-Version des OPD-Strukturfragebogens (OPD-SFK)/ Development of a 12-item version of the OPD-Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQS). Zeitschrift Für Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie, 61(3), 262–274. doi: https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2015.61.3.262

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272

Fokkema, M., & Greiff, S. (2017). How Performing PCA and CFA on the Same Data Equals Trouble. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(6), 399-402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000460

Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable. Marketing Bulletin, 2(1), 66-70.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7° ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

Hentschel, A. G., & Livesley, W. J. (2013). The General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD): Factor Structure, Incremental Validity of Self-Pathology, and Relations to DSM–IV Personality Disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(5), 479-485. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.778273

Hinton, P., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2014). SPSS Explained (2° ed.). New York: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315797298

Hofmann, R. J. (1978). Complexity And Simplicity As Objective Indices Descriptive Of Factor Solutions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13(2), 247-250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1302_9

Hopwood, C. J., Good, E. W., & Morey, L. C. (2018). Validity of the DSM–5 Levels of Personality Functioning Scale–Self Report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 650-659. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1420660

Hopwood, C. J., Malone, J. C., Ansell, E. B., Sanislow, C. A., Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., … Morey, L. C. (2011). Personality Assessment in DSM-5: Empirical Support for Rating Severity, Style, and Traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(3), 305–320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.305

Hopwood, C. J., Schade, N., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G. C., & Markon, K. E. (2013). Connecting DSM-5 Personality Traits and Pathological Beliefs: Toward a Unifying Model. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35(2), 162-172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9332-3

Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., Wright, A. G. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). “DSM-5 personality traits and DSM–IV personality disorders”: Correction to Hopwood et al. (2012). Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(2), 432-432. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028553

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Hutsebaut, J., Feenstra, D. J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2016). Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Self-Report Questionnaire for the Assessment of the DSM–5 level of Personality Functioning Scale: The LPFS Brief Form (LPFS-BF). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(2), 192-197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000159

Kernberg, O. F. (2012). Overview and critique of the classification of personality disorders proposed for DSM-V. Schweizer Archiv Für Neurologie Und Psychiatrie, 163(7), 234-238. doi: https://doi.org/10.4414/sanp.2012.00110

Korkmaz, S., Goksuluk, D., & Zararsiz, G. (2014). MVN: An R Package for Assessing Multivariate Normality. The R Journal, 6(2), 151-162. doi: https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2014-031

Laireiter, A. (2013). Diagnostik in der Psychotherapie. Springer-Verlag.

Leising, D., & Zimmermann, J. (2011). An Integrative Conceptual Framework for Assessing Personality and Personality Pathology. Review of General Psychology, 15(4), 317-330. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025070

Lenzenweger, M. F., Clarkin, J. F., Kernberg, O. F., & Foelsch, P. A. (2001). The Inventory of Personality Organization: Psychometric properties, factorial composition, and criterion relations with affect, aggressive dyscontrol, psychosis proneness, and self-domains in a nonclinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 13(4), 577-591. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.577

Leung, S.-O. (2011). A Comparison of Psychometric Properties and Normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-Point Likert Scales. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(4), 412-421. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2011.580697

Levy, K., & Clarkin, J. F. (2003). The influence of client variables on psychotherapy. En M. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (Vol. 5, pp. 194-226). New York: Wiley & Sons.

Leys, C., Klein, O., Dominicy, Y., & Ley, C. (2018). Detecting multivariate outliers: Use a robust variant of the Mahalanobis distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 150-156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.011

Livesley, W. J. (1998). Suggestions for a Framework for an Empirically Based Classification of Personality Disorder. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 43(2), 137-147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/070674379804300202

Luyten, P., & Blatt, S. J. (2011). Integrating theory-driven and empirically-derived models of personality development and psychopathology: A proposal for DSM V. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(1), 52-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.003

Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519

McCabe, G. A., & Widiger, T. A. (2020). A comprehensive comparison of the ICD-11 and DSM–5 section III personality disorder models. Psychological Assessment, 32(1), 72-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000772

Morey, L. C., Berghuis, H., Bender, D. S., Verheul, R., Krueger, R. F., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a Model for Assessing Level of Personality Functioning in DSM–5, Part II: Empirical Articulation of a Core Dimension of Personality Pathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 347-353. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.577853

Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor Models and Rotations: Exploring the Extent to Which Multidimensional Data Yield Univocal Scale Scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(6), 544-559. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.496477

Revelle, W. (2019). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Recuperado de https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych Version = 1.9.12

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). A Scaled Difference Chi-Square Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal, 66(4), 507-514. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.199064

Simkin, H., Borchardt Dutera, L., & Azzollini, S. (2020). Evidencias de validez del Compendio Internacional de Ítems de Personalidad Abreviado. Liberabit: Revista Peruana de Psicología, 26(1), 1-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2020.v26n1.02

Sleep, C. E., Wygant, D. B., & Miller, J. D. (2018). Examining the Incremental Utility of DSM-5 Section III Traits and Impairment in Relation to Traditional Personality Disorder Scores in a Female Correctional Sample. Journal of Personality Disorders, 32(6), 738-752. doi: https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2017_31_320

Stieglitz, R.-D. (2014). Psychometrische Verfahren in der Psychotherapie. Verhaltenstherapie, 24(1), 56-65.

Stover, J. B., & Bruno, F. E. (2019). Estudios psicométricos del Level Of Personality Function Scale en adultos de Buenos Aires. XI Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Práctica Profesional En Psicología. XXVI Jornadas de Investigación. XV Encuentro de Investigadores En Psicología del Mercosur. I Encuentro de Investigación de Terapia Ocupacional. I Encuentro de Musicoterapia. Facultad de Psicología-Universidad de Buenos Aires.

Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S. New York: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2

Verheul, R., Andrea, H., Berghout, C. C., Dolan, C., Busschbach, J. J. V., van der Kroft, P. J. A., … Fonagy, P. (2008). Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): Development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 20(1), 23-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.23

Weekers, L. C., Hutsebaut, J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2019). The Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0: Update of a brief instrument for assessing level of personality functioning. Personality and Mental Health, 13(1), 3-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1434

World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnostic criteria for research (Vol. 2). World Health Organization.

Yu, C.-Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Los Ángeles: University of California.

Zimmermann, J., Benecke, C., Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., Krueger, R. F., & Leising, D. (2013). Persönlichkeitsdiagnostik im DSM-5. Psychotherapeut, 58(5), 455-465. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00278-013-1009-1