Adaptação e evidências de validade do Traumatic Grief Inventory para o Brasil

Francine Náthalie Ferraresi Rodrigues Queluz; João Paulo  Lessa; Sidnei Rinaldo Priolo Filho; Loriane Trombini Frick; Jucimara Zacarias Martins; Rodrigo Sanches Peres; Heila Magali Silva Veiga; Sheyla Christine Santos Fernandes; Ana Carina  Stelko-Pereira; Pedro A. Cortez

doi:10.22235/cp.v16i2.2442

Authors

Francine Náthalie Ferraresi Rodrigues Queluz Centro Universitário Adventista de São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8869-6879
João Paulo Lessa Universidade São Francisco https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0751-7662
Sidnei Rinaldo Priolo Filho Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1320-9674
Loriane Trombini Frick Universidade Federal do Paraná http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-4329
Jucimara Zacarias Martins Centro Universitário Unigran Capital http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6800-3468
Rodrigo Sanches Peres Universidade Federal de Uberlândia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2957-7554
Heila Magali Silva Veiga Universidade Federal de Uberlândia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7429-8124
Sheyla Christine Santos Fernandes Universidade Federal de Alagoas http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4759-1314
Ana Carina Stelko-Pereira Universidade Federal do Paraná http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8089-132X
Pedro A. Cortez Universidade Metodista de São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0107-2033

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v16i2.2442

Keywords:

death, psychological assessment, mental health, Grief, psychometric properties, factorial analysis

Abstract

The aim of the this study was to verify the evidence of validity of the reduced version adapted for Brazilian Portuguese of the Traumatic Grief Inventory, through confirmatory factor analysis and relationship with external variables, in addition to assessing the reliability and presence of invariance. The first step consisted of the adaptation and evaluation by expert judges of the translated version. After the evaluation, the pilot version was answered by five participants of the target population, for semantic and content evaluation, being named, in Brazil, as the Inventário de Luto Traumático (ILT-BR). Then, 211 Brazilians, who went through a grieving process, answered the following instruments: Sociodemographic Questionnaire, Mental Health Self-Perception Questionnaire, and ILT-BR. The ILT-BR presented good fit indexes and reliability, positively correlated with stress, fear, and obsessive thoughts, with no invariance found. From these results, we concluded that the ILT-BR is suitable for use in Brazil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexandre, N. M. C. & Coluci, M. Z. O. (2011). Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16(7), 3061-3068.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Pub.

Baş, S., Yüksel, Ö., Ülbe, S., & Güngör, D. (2020). Turkish Version of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report (TGI-SR): validity and reliability. Death Studies, 1, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1850551

Boelen, P. A. & Smid, G. E. (2017). The Traumatic Grief Inventory Self-Report Version (TGI-SR): introduction and preliminary psychometric evaluation. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 22(3), 196-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2017.1284488

Boelen, P. A., Djelantik, A. A. A. M. J., Keijser, J., Lenferink, L. I. M., & Smid, G. E. (2018). Further validation of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report (TGI-SR): a measure of persistent complex bereavement disorder and prolonged grief disorder. Death Studies, 43(6), 351-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2018.1480546

Borsa, J. C. & Seize, M. M. (2017). Construção e adaptação de instrumentos psicológicos. Em B. F. Damásio & J. C. Borsa (Org.), Manual de desenvolvimento de instrumentos psicológicos (pp. 21-43). Vetor.

Carver, C. S. & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 679-704. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352

Cortez, P. A., Joseph, S. J., Das, N., Bhandari, S. S., & Shoib, S. (2020). Tools to measure psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic: What do we have in the platter? Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 53(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.ajp.2020.102371

Dahdah, D. F., Bombarda, T. B., Frizzo, H. C. F., & Joaquim, R. H. V. T. (2019). Revisão sistemática sobre o luto e terapia ocupacional. Caderno Brasileiro de Terapia Ocupacional, 27(1), 186-196. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoAR1079

Damásio, B. F. (2012). Uso da análise fatorial exploratória em psicologia. Avaliação Psicológica, 11(2), 213-228.

Damásio, B. F. (2013). Contribuições da Análise Fatorial Confirmatória Multigrupo (AFCMG) na avaliação de invariância de instrumentos psicométricos. Psico-USF, 18(2), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712013000200005.

Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046.

Elizur, D. & Shye, S. (1990). Quality of work life and its relation to quality of life. Applied Psychology, 39(3), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1990.tb01054.x

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Uppersaddle River.

Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Lee, S. A. & Neimeyer, R. A. (2020): Pandemic Grief Scale: A screening tool for dysfunctional grief due to a COVID-19 loss. Death Studies, 43(6), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1853885

Levin, J. & Fox, J. A. (2004). Estatística para ciências humanas. Pearson.

Maciejewski, P. K., Maercker, A., Boelen, P. A., & Prigerson, H. G. (2016). “Prolonged grief disorder” and “persistent complex bereavement disorder”, but not “complicated grief”, are one and the same diagnostic entity: an analysis of data from the Yale Bereavement Study. World Psychiatry, 15(3), 266-275. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20348

Prigerson, H. G., Horowitz, M. J., Jacobs, S. C., Parkes, C. M., Aslan, M., Goodkin, K., Raphael, B., Marwit, S. J., Wortman, C., Neimeyer, R. A., Bonanno, G. A., Block, S. D., Kissane, D., Boelen, P., Maercker, A., Litz, B. T., Johnson, J. G., First, M. B., & Maciejewski, P. K. (2009). Prolonged Grief Disorder: psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Medicine, 6(8), e1000121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121

Putnick, D. L. & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

Van de Vijver, P. J. R. (2016). Test adaptations. Em F. T. L. Leong, D. Bartram, F. M. Cheung, K. F. Geisinger, & D. Iliescu (Eds.), The ITC International Handbook of Testing and Assessment (pp. 364-376). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199356942.003.0025

Ventura-León, J. L. & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente Omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 625-627.