UNA NUEVA PERSPECTIVA SOBRE LAS CREENCIAS IGUALITARIAS: CONTRA-DOMINANCIA SOCIAL

Maite Beramendi; Elena Zubieta

doi:10.22235/cp.v10i2.1152

Authors

Maite Beramendi Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Buenos Aires CONICET
Elena Zubieta Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Buenos Aires CONICET

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v10i2.1152

Keywords:

Counter-Dominance Orientation, Social Dominance Orientation, political perception, political effectiveness

Abstract

In recent studies, Counter-Dominance Orientation (CDO) arises as a counterpart of the Social Dominance Orientation (SDO). CDO assesses psychological responses to the oppression of hierarchical systems. The purpose of the present study was to explore profiles of CDO and SDO in relation to political variables such as national and international political perception, political participation, political efficacy, anomy perception, among others. To fulfill this objective, a questionnaire with 5 self-administered scales and socio-demographic items was developed. It was applied to Argentinean residents of Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. The results show that people with a SDO profile are mainly characterized by dissatisfaction with national political operation, a perception of anomy, and a right self political position. On the contrary, individuals with a CDO profile mostly focus their discontent with international policies or power differences, and a left self political position.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achaval, L. (2011). Orientación a la dominancia social en estudiantes universitarios (tesis de Licenciatura). Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina, Buenos Aires.

Alexander, M., Levin, S., & Henry, P. J. (2005). Image Theory, Social Identity, and Social Dominance: Structural Characteristics and Individual Motives Underlying International Images. Political Psychology, 26(1), 27-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00408.x

Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47–92. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2

Arnoso Martinez, M., Bombelli, J., Muratori, M., Mele, S., & Zubieta, E. (2014). La CONADEP y el informe nunca más: conocimiento, eficacia y emociones. Anuario de investigaciones, XX, 197-205.

Beramendi, M., Sosa, F., & Zubieta, E. (2012). Anomia y percepción de control en el contexto argentino. Revista de Psicología Política, 45, 43-60.

Bobowik, M., Pratto, F., Bou Zeineddine, F., Páez, D., & Basabe, N. (2012, July). The antecedents of a “protester” in the Basque Country: Moderating role of counter-dominance orientation. The 35th Annual Meetings of the International Society of Political Psychology, Chicago.

Bou Zeineddine, F., Pratto, F., Foels, R., Stewart, A. L., Aiello, A., Aranda, M., . . . Sweetman, J. (2012, April). Getting engaged instead of getting out: Restricting migration, system condemnation, and political engagement. Paper presented at the Processes Influencing Democratic Ownership and Participation conference: Surrey, England.

Caparrós, M. (2011). Argentinismos. Buenos Aires: Planeta.

Cárdenas, M., Meza, P., Lagues, K, & Yañez, S. (2010). Adaptación y validación de la Escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social (SDO) en una muestra chilena. Universitas Psychologica, 9(1), 161-168. doi: 10.5354/0719-0581.2010.17098.

Castillo Mayén, M. R. & Montes Berges, B. (2008). Aportaciones de la teoría de la dominancia social al análisis de la discriminación del género. Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Jaén, España.

Cozzolino, P. & Snyder, M. (2008). Good Times, Bad Times: How Personal Disadvantage Moderates the Relationship Between Social Dominance and Efforts to Win. Personality and Social Psychology Buleetinl, 34, 1420-1433. doi: 10.1177/0146167208321595.

Dambrun, M., Kamiejski, R., Haddadi, N., & Duarte, S. (2009). Why does social dominance orientation decrease with university exposure to the social sciences? The impact of institutional socialization and the mediating role of ‘geneticism’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 88-100. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.498.

Delfino, G. & Zubieta, E. (2010). Participación Política: conceptos y modalidades. Anuario de Investigaciones, XVII, 211-220.

Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 41–113. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2601(01)80004-6.

Duckitt, J. & Sibly, C. G. (2010). Personality, Ideology, Prejudice, and Politics: A Dual-Process Motivational Model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861-1894.

Eicher, V., Pratto, F., Morselli, D., Bou Zeineddine, F., & Foels, R. (2012, July). Dominance and emotions in the context of the Arab uprisings. The 35th Annual Meetings of the International Society of Political Psychology, Chicago.

Federico, C. (1999). The Interactive Effects of Social Dominance Orientation, Group Status, and Perceived Stability on Favoritism for High-Status Groups. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 2(2), 119-143. doi: 10.1177/1368430299022002.

Foels, R., Kang, J., Cidam, A. & Pratto, F. (Julio, 2012). Political Moderates are Better at Threat Detection. The 35th Annual Meetings of the International Society of Political Psychology, Chicago.

Henry, P. J., Sidanius, J., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (2005). Social Dominance Orientation, Authoritarianism, and Support for Intergroup Violence between the Middle East and America. Political Psychology, 26(4), 569-583. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00432.x.

Horn, J. & McArdle, J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3), 117-144. doi:10.1080/03610739208253916.

Jetten, J. & Iyer, A. (2010). Different meanings of the social dominance orientation concept: predicting political attitudes over time. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 385-404. doi: 10.1348/014466609x435723.

Latinobarómetro (2011). Informe 2011. Recuperado de http://www.latinobarometro.org

Levin, D. (2005, September). Political Participation as a Function of Social Dominance Orientation: How SDO Turns Out Majority Groups and Turns Off Minority Groups. Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC.

Levin, S. (2004). Perceived Group Status Differences and the Effects of Gender, Ethnicity, and Religion on Social Dominance Orientation. Political Psychology, 25(1), 31-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00355.x

Mooi, E. & Sarstedt, M. (2011). A Concise Guide to Market Research. The Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Estados Unidos: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Morselli, D., Pratto, F., Bou Zeineddine, F., Aranda, M., Lee Stewart, A., Cidam, A., ... Sweetman, J. (2012, July). Social Dominance and Counter Dominance Orientation Scales (SDO/CDO): Testing Measurement Invariance. The 35th Annual Meetings of the International Society of Political Psychology, Chicago.

Munné, F. (1980). Psicología social. Barcelona: CEAC.

Muratori, M., Delfino, G. I., & Zubieta E. (2012, July). SDO and values. Comparing civilian and military students. The 35th Annual Meetings of the International Society of Political Psychology, Chicago.

Petit, L. & Costa, G. (2011). Dominancia social: el género como jerarquía social. Hologramática, 14(3), 71-83.

Pratto, F. & Shih, M. (2000). Social Dominance Orientation and group context in implicit group prejudice. Psychological Science, 11(6), 525-518. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00299.

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271-320. doi: 10.1080/10463280601055772.

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A Personality Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741-763. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.

Pratto, F., Stewart, A., Foels, R., Henkel, K., Bou Zeineddine, F., & Morselli, D. (2012, July). Beyond Me and Mine: Low Social Dominance Orientation and Inclusiveness. The 35th Annual Meetings of the International Society of Political Psychology, Chicago.

Quist, R. M. & Resendez, M.G. (2002). Social dominance threat: examining social dominance theory’s explanation of prejudice as legitimizing myths. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(4), 287-293. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp2404_4.

Rabinowitz, J. L. (1999). Go with the flow or fight the power? The interactive effects of social dominance orientation and perceived injustice on support for the status quo. Political Psychology, 20(1), 1-24. doi: 10.1111/0162-895x.00135.

Roccato, M., Gattino, S. & Patris, E. (2000). Personalidad, Valores y Orientación Política. Psicología Política, 21, 73-97.

Rodríguez, M., Sabucedo, J. M., & Costa, M. (1993). Factores motivacionales y psicosociales asociados a los distintos tipos de acción política. Psicología Política, 7, 19-38.

Sabucedo, J. M. (1996). Psicología Política. España: Síntesis Psicológica.

Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. (2010). The personality bases of ideology: A one-year longitudinal study. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 540-559. doi: 10.1080/00224540903365364.

Sidanius, J. & Levin, S. (1999). Social Dominance and Social Identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup Favoritism or Outgroup Derogation. Political Psychology, 20(1), 99-126. doi: 10.1111/0162-895x.00138.

Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J., & Pratto, F. (2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: an extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41-67. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200001/02)30:1<41::AID-EJSP976>3.0.CO;2-O.

Sidanius, J. & Peña, Y. (2003). The Gendered Nature of Family Structure and Group-based Anti-egalitarianism: A Cross-national Analysis. Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 243- 251. doi: 10.1080/00224540309598443.

Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004). Social Dominance Theory: Its Agenda and Method. Political Psychology, 25(6), 845-880.

Sidanius, J., Sinclair, S., & Pratto, F. (2006). Social Dominance Orientation, Gender, and Increasing Educational Exposure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1640–1653. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00401.x.

Stewart, A., Pratto, F., Bou Zeineddine, F., Foels, R., Aiello, A., Aranda, M., ... & Prati, F. (2012, July). Protesting to Support Protests: Ideology and Identity Predict International Support for the Arab Uprisings. The 35th Annual Meetings of the International Society of Political Psychology, Chicago.

Szretter-Noste, E. (2013). Apunte de regresión lineal. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Recuperado de http://mate.dm.uba.ar/~meszre/apunte_regresion_lineal_szretter.pdf

Zubieta, E., Beramendi, M., Sosa, F., & Torres, A. (2011). Sexismo ambivalente, estereotipos y valores en el ámbito militar. Revista de Psicología, 29(1), 101-130.

Zubieta, E., Delfino, G., & Fernández, O. (2007). Dominancia social, valores y posicionamiento ideológico en jóvenes universitarios. Psicodebate, 8, 151-169.

Zubieta, E., Muratori, M., & Mele, S. (2012). Bienestar, clima emocional, percepción de problemas sociales y confianza. Anuario de investigaciones, XVIII, 97-106.