¿El apego humano-perro aumenta la resiliencia y la resistencia a la COVID-19? Un enfoque biopsicosocial y una investigación a futuro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v15i2.2440Palabras clave:
apego, canis lupus familiaris, inmunidad cruzada, oxitocina, pandemiaResumen
Este artículo es una propuesta biopsicosocial sobre la mejora de la resiliencia a enfermedades, incluida la COVID-19, debido al apego afectivo entre humanos y perros. La resiliencia se refiere a la capacidad humana física y emocional de responder positivamente a los eventos adversos, como las enfermedades. Recientemente, algunos autores han propuesto hipótesis independientes sobre el papel de la oxitocina (OT) y la inmunidad cruzada para aumentar la resiliencia y la respuesta frente a la COVID-19. Aquí se extiende esa hipótesis al campo biopsicosocial, incluyendo los bien conocidos beneficios del apego afectivo humano-perro sobre la salud humana. Se propone que las relaciones de afecto fuerte y recíproco entre humanos y perros pueden aumentar la resiliencia a la COVID-19, debido al papel de la OT en la respuesta inmune, sumando inmunidad cruzada. Otros beneficios como amortiguar el efecto de las emociones, la comodidad mental y el alivio del estrés son funciones complementarias de los perros en la salud humana y viceversa.
Descargas
Citas
Beck, A. M. & Meyers, N. M. (1996). Health enhancement and companion animal ownership. Annual Review Public Health, 17(1), 247-257. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.001335
Bowlby, J. (1979). The Bowlby-Ainsworth attachment theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(4), 637-638. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00064955
Cacioppo, S., Bianchi-Demicheli, F., Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (2012). Social neuroscience of love. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 9, 3-13.
Cai, Q., Feng, L., & Yap, K. Z. (2018). Systematic review and meta-analysis of reported adverse events of long-term intranasal oxytocin treatment for autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatry Clinical Neurosciences, 72(3), 140‐151. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12627
Cal, S. F., Sá, L. R., Glustak, M. E., & Santiago, M. B. (2015). Resilience in chronic diseases: a systematic review. Cogent Psychology, 2(1), 1024928. doi: 10.1080/23311908.2015.1024928
Carter, C. S. (1998). Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23(8), 779-818. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4530(98)00055-9
Crawford, E. K., Worsham, N. L. & Swinehart, E. R. (2006). Benefits derived from companion animals, and the use of the term “attachment”. Anthrozoös, 19(2), 98-112. doi: 10.2752/089279306785593757
Decaro, N. & Buonavoglia, C. (2008). An update on canine coronaviruses: viral evolution and pathobiology. Veterinary Microbiology, 132(3–4), 221-234. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.06.007.
Feldman, R. (2017). The neurobiology of human attachments. Trends Cognitive Sciences, 21(2), 80-99. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.007
Handlin, L., Hydbring-Sandberg, E., Nilsson, A., Ejdebäck, M., Jansson, A. & Uvnäs-Moberg, K. (2011). Short-term interaction between dogs and their owners: effects on oxytocin, cortisol, insulin and heart rate-an exploratory study. Anthrozoös, 24(3), 301-315. doi: 10.2752/175303711X13045914865385
Jurgiel, J., Filipiakc, K. J., Szarpakd, L., Jaguszewski, M., Smerka, J., & Dzieciątkowskig, T. (2020). Do pets protect their owners in the COVID-19 era? Medical Hypotheses, 142, 109831. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109831
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., McGuire, L., Robles, T., & Glaser, R. (2002). Psychoneuroimmunology and psychosomatic medicine: back to the future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64(1), 15-28. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200201000-00004
Kiros, M., Andualem, H., Kiros, T., Hailemichael, W., Getu, S., Geteneh, A., Alemu, D., & Abegaz, W. E. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic: current knowledge about the role of pets and other animals in disease transmission. Virology Journal, 17, 143. doi: 10.1186/s12985-020-01416-9
Kis, A., Ciobica, A., & Topál, J. (2017). The effect of oxytocin on human-directed social behaviour in dogs (Canis familiaris). Hormones and Behavior, 94, 40-52. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.06.001
Kurdek, L. A. (2008). Pet dogs as attachment figures. Journal Society Personal Relationships, 25, 247-266. doi: 10.1037/a0014979
Liu, Y. & Wang, Z. X. (2003). Nucleus accumbens OT and dopamine interact to regulate pair-bond formation in female prairie voles. Neuroscience, 121(3), 537-544. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00555-4
Loos, C., Atyeo, C., Fischinger, S., Burke, J., Slein, M. D., Streeck, H., Lauffenburger, D., Ryan, E., Charles, R. C., & Alter, G. (2020). Evolution of early SARS-CoV-2 and cross-coronavirus immunity. mSphere, 5, e00622-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00622-20.
Loth, M. K. & Donaldson, Z. R. (2021). Oxytocin, dopamine, and opioid interactions underlying pair bonding: highlighting a potential role for microglia. Endocrinology, 162(2), 1-16. doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqaa223
MacDonalds, K. S. (2013). Sex, receptors, and attachment: a review of individual factors influencing response to oxytocin. Frontier Neuroscience, 6, 1-8. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00194
Mueller, M. K., Gee, N. R., & Bures, R. M. (2018). Human-animal interaction as a social determinant of health: descriptive findings from the health and retirement study. BMC Public Health, 18, 305. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5188-0
Nagasawa, M., Kikusui, T., Onakab, T., & Ohtaa, M. (2009). Dog's gaze at its owner increases owner's urinary oxytocin during social interaction. Hormones and Behavior, 55, 434-441. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.12.002
Nagasawa, M., Mitsui, S., En, S., Ohtani, N., Ohta, M., Sakuma, Y., Onaka, T., Mogi, K., & Kikusui, T. (2015). Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Science, 348(6232), 333-336. doi: 10.1126/science.1261022
Payne, E., Bennett, P. C., & McGreevy, P. D. (2015). Current perspectives on attachment and bonding in the dog–human dyad. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 8, 71-79. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S74972
Putnam, P. T., Young, L. J., & Gothard, K. M. (2018). Bridging the gap between rodents and humans: The role of non-human primates in oxytocin research. American Journal Primatology, e22756, 1-16. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22756
Ratschen, E., Shoesmith, E., Shahab, L., Silva, K., Kale, D., Toner, P., Reeve, C., & Mills, D. S. (2020). Human-animal relationships and interactions during the Covid-19 lockdown phase in the UK: Investigating links with mental health and loneliness. PLoS One, 15(9): e0239397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239397
Romero, T., Nagasawa, M., Mogi, K., Hasegawa, T., & Kikusui, T. (2014). Oxytocin promotes social bonding in dogs. Proceedings of National Academy Sciences, 111, 9085-9090. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322868111
Salas García, M. C., Schorr, A. R., Arnold, W., Fei, N., & Gilbert, J. A. (2020). Pets as a novel microbiome-based therapy. In: M. Pastorinho & A. Sousa (Eds.), Pets as Sentinels, Forecasters and Promoters of Human Health (pp. 245-267). Springer.
Schneider, D. & Ayres, J. (2008). Two ways to survive infection: what resistance and tolerance can teach us about treating infectious diseases. Nature Reviews Immunology, 8, 889-895. doi.org/10.1038/nri2432
Serpell, J. A. (2016). From paragon to pariah: cross-cultural perspectives on attitudes to dogs. In: J. A. Serpell (Ed.), The Domestic Dog, (pp. 300-315). doi: 10.1017/9781139161800.015
Soumier, A. & Sirigu, A. (2020). Oxytocin as a potential defense against COVID-19? Medical Hypothesis, 140. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109785
Sussman, R. W. & Champan, A. (Eds.). (2004). The Origins and Nature of Sociality. Routledge.
Thielke, L. E., Rosenlicht, G., Saturn, S. R., & Udell, M. A. R. (2017). Nasally administered oxytocin has limited effects on owner-directed attachment behavior in pet dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). Frontiers in Psychology, 29. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01699
Wells, D. L. (2007). Domestic dogs and human health: An overview. British Journal Health Psychology, 12, 145-156. doi: 10.1348/135910706X103284
Welsh, R. M., Che, J. W., Brehm, M. A., & Selin, L. K. (2010). Heterologous immunity between viruses. Immunological Reviews, 235, 244-266. doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2010.00897.x.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Universidad Católica del Uruguay
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.