ANALISIS Y VALORACION DE POLITICAS PREVENTIVAS DE INCONDUCTAS DE INVESTIGADORES CIENTIFICOS

  • Omar França Departamento de Formación Humanística, Universidad Católica del Uruguay Académico de Número de la Academia Nacional de Medicina del Uruguay

Resumen

Se analizan y evalúan los criterios éticos y legales subyacentes a los principales documentos nacionales e internacionales que establecen políticas concernientes a la prevención y control de las inconductas de los investigadores científicos. Finalmente se proponen las medidas operativas mínimas que podrían contribuir a asegurar eficientemente la integridad investigativa tales como la permanencia de los datos brutos para el escrutinio de los colegas, la obligación de la denuncia anónima de las inconductas, y el cambio de incentivos de la producción académica.

Citas

Association of Universities General Board (2013). Responsible research data management and the prevention of scientific misconduct. Amsterdam Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Recuperado de: www.knaw.nl

Association of Universities in the Netherlands (2012). The Netherlands Code of Conduct for Scientific Practice – Principles of good scientific teaching and research. Recuperado de http://www.vsnu.nl/files/documenten/Domeinen/Onderzoek/The_Netherlands_Code_of_Conduct_for_Scientific_Practice_2012.pdf

Bravo Toledo, R. (2012). Aspectos éticos en las publicaciones científicas. Recuperado de http://www.infodoctor.org/rafabravo/fraude.htm

Brispe. II Segunda Reunión de Brasil sobre Integridad de la investigación científica, la ética de la ciencia y las publicaciones (mayo-junio, 2012). Declaración Conjunta. Recuperado de http://www.fapesp.br/boaspraticas/JointStatementonResearchIntegrity_IIBRISPE_2012_Spanish.pdf

Canadian Institutes of health Research (CIHR), The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC). (2010). The tri-agency framework: responsible conduct of research. Recuperado de http://www.rcr.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/framework-cadre/

D’angelo, J. (2012). Ethics in science. Ethical misconduct in scientific Research. Boca Raton (FL): Taylor & Francis Group.

Danish Ministry Of Higher Education. (2014). Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Copenhague: Ministry of Higher Education and Science. Recuperado de http://ufm.dk/publikationer/2014/filer-2014/the-danish-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity.pdf

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (2013). Proposals for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice Recommendations of the Commission on Professional Self-Regulation in Science. Bonn, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Recuperado de http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/dfg_im_profil/reden_stellungnahmen/download/empfehlung_wiss_praxis_1310.pdf

Di Trocchio, F. (2013). Las mentiras de la ciencia. Madrid: Alianza.
EEUU: prisión por falsificar resultados en un estudio sobre VIH. (Julio, 2015). Diario Médico. Recuperado de http://www.diariomedico.com/2015/07/06/area-profesional/normativa/eeuu-prision-falsificar-resultados-estudio-vih

European Research Council (ERC) (2012). Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise. Recuperado de http://www.interacademies.net/file.aspx?id=19789

European Science Foundation Organization. Forum on research integrity (2010). Fostering Research Integrity in Europe A report by the ESF Member. Strasbourg. Recuperado de http://www.oeawi.at/downloads/ESF-research-integrity-report.pdf

European Science Foundation(ESF), All European Academies (ALLEA) (2011). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Amsterdam. Recuperado de http://www.esf.org/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&g=0&t=1456930424&hash=44725c83f2083a569b183b7957948e5d487ed861&file=fileadmin/be_user/CEO_Unit/MO_FORA/MOFORUM_ResearchIntegrity/Code_Conduct_ResearchIntegrity.pdf

Finish Advisory Board On Research Integrity (2012). Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland Finish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. Recuperado de http://www.tenk.fi/en/resposible-conduct-research-guidelines

Franca, O. (2014a). La falsedad investigativa de los investigadores científicos. Estudios Jurídicos, 12, 21-48.

Franca,O. (2014b). Estrategias para inhibir y prevenir el fraude en la investigación científica. Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética, 27(2), 90-99.

Freeland Judson, H. (2004). The great betrayal. Fraud in science. Orlando: Harcourt Books.

Hernández-Chavarría,F. (2007). Fraude en la autoría de artículos científicos. Biomed, 17, 127-140. Recuperado de: http://www.revbiomed.uady.mx/pdf/rb071827.pdf

Inter Academy Council (IAP), The Global Network Of Science Academies. (2012). Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report. Amsterdam, IAC/IAP. Recuperado de: http://www.interacademycouncil.net/24026/GlobalReport.aspx.

Inter Academy Council, The Global Network Of Science Academies (IAC/IAP) (2013). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (Vancouver-guidelines). Recuperado de http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf

Irish Council Of Bioethics (2010). Recommendations for promoting Research Integrity. Dublin. Recuperado de http://health.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Recommendations_for_Promoting1.pdf

Irish Universities Association (2013). Draft Policy Statement on Ensuring Research Integrity in Ireland. Irish Universities Association (IUA). Recuperado de http://www.iua.ie/research-innovation/research-integrity/

Medical Journal Editors. International committee (ICMJE). (2009). Investigating Research Misconduct Allegations in International Collaborative Research Projects. Recuperado de http://www.icmje.org/

National Academy Of Sciences, National Academy Of Engineering, Institute Of Medicine (NAS-NAE-IOM). (2009). Guide of Responsible Conduct in Research. Recuperado de http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12192/on-being-a-scientist-a-guide-to-responsible-conduct-in

National Health and Medical Research Council. (2007) Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research. Recuperado de https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/r39

Organization For Economic Cooperation And Development (Oecd) Global Science Forum. (2007) Best Practices for Ensuring Scientific Integrity and Preventing Misconduct. Recuperado de http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/40188303.pdf

Roadhes (1997). Model Policy for Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct. Office of Research Integrity.

Royal Netherlands Academy Of Arts And Sciences (2012). The Concordat to support research integrity. Recuperado de http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/highereducation/Documents/2012/TheConcordatToSupportResearchIntegrity.pdf

Science Council Of Japan (SCJ). (2006) Statement: Code of Conduct for Scientists. Science Council of Japan. Recuperado de http://www.scj.go.jp/en/report/code.html

United Kingdom Research Integrity Office (UKRIO). (2008) Procedures for the Investigation of Misconduct in Research. Recuperado de http://ukrio.org/publications/misconduct-investigation-procedure/

United Kingdom Research Integrity Office (UKRIO) (2009) .Code Of Practice For Research Promoting good practice and preventing misconduct. London. UKRIO. Recuperado de http://www.oeawi.at/downloads/UKRIO-Code-of-Practice-for-Research1.pdf

United Kingdom Research Integrity Office (UKRIO) (2013). RCUK Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct. UK Research Councils (RCUK). Recuperado de: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/reviews/grc/RCUKPolicyandGuidelinesonGovernanceofGoodResearchPracticeFebruary2013.pdf

U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services. The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) (2000). Federal Research Misconduct Policy. Recuperado de http://www.aps.org/policy/statements/federalpolicy.cfm

U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services (2005). Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct; Final Rule. Federal Register, 70(94). Recuperado de http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15898182

U.S. Office Of Research Integrity (ORI) (1995). Guidelines for Institutions and Whistle blowers: Responding to possible Retaliation Against Whistleblowers in Extramural Research. Recuperado de http://ori.hhs.gov/guidelines-whistleblowers

World Conference On Research Integrity (2010). Singapore Statement on Research Integrity. Recuperado de http://www.singaporestatement.org/statement.html

World Conference On Research Integrity (2013). Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations. Recuperado de http://www.researchintegrity.org/Statements/Montreal%20Statement%20English.pdf
Publicado
2016-05-27
Cómo citar
FRANÇA, Omar. ANALISIS Y VALORACION DE POLITICAS PREVENTIVAS DE INCONDUCTAS DE INVESTIGADORES CIENTIFICOS. Ciencias Psicológicas, [S.l.], p. 77-83, may 2016. ISSN 1688-4221. Disponible en: <https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/1156>. Fecha de acceso: 21 july 2018 doi: https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v10i2.1156.
Sección
CONFERENCIAS, COMUNICACIONES Y REVISIONES

Palabras clave

inconductas de científicos; ética de la investigación; fraude investigativo