Thoughts on the principle of equality in the case law of the Supreme Court of Justice of Uruguay.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v0i5.819Keywords:
unconstitutionality of laws, equality, Uruguay, case lawAbstract
Abstract. It is from a reasoning which has been historically held by the Supreme Court of Justice as regards the cases of unconstitutionality on account of the infringement of the principle of equality that references are proved to correspond to a period in excess of comparative law and whose current use compromises the analysis of the matter within the national case law. Upon the identification of the problem, there arises the need to urgently update case law in such a crucial area.
Downloads
References
Bernstein, David E., “The Story of Lochner v. New York: Impediment to the Growth of the Regulatory State”, en Michael C. Dorf (ed.), Constitutional Law Stories, Nueva York: Foundation Press, 2004.
Eisgruber, Christopher L., “The Story of Dred Scott: Originalism’s Forgotten Past”, en Michael C. Dorf (ed.), Constitutional Law Stories, Nueva York: Foundation Press, 2004.
Fernández Segado, Francisco, El sistema constitucional español, Madrid: Dykinson, 1992.
Harris, Cheryl I., “The Story of Plessy v. Ferguson: The Death and Resurrection of Racial Formalism”, en Michael C. Dorf (ed.), Constitutional Law Stories, Nueva York: Foundation Press, 2004.
Korzeniak, José, Derecho constitucional 2.o, Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria, 1985.
Risso Ferrand, Martín, Algunas garantías básicas de los derechos humanos, Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria, 2008.
— Derecho constitucional, Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria, 2.a ed. actualizada y ampliada, 2006.
— ¿Qué es la Constitución?, Montevideo: Universidad Católica del Uruguay, 2010.
Stone, Geoffrey R., Louis M. Seidman, Cass R. Sunstein, Mark V. Tushnet y Pamela S. Karlan, Constitutional Law, Aspen, 2005.
Sullivan, Kathleen M., y Gerald Gunther, Constitutional Law, Nueva York: Foundation Press y Thomson West, 15.a ed., 2004.