Patterns of Cannabis Use and Socio-Cognitive Factors of People who Use Cannabis across Cannabis Sources in Uruguay

Paul Ruiz; Agostina Barey; Angelina Pilatti; Ricardo Pautassi

doi:10.22235/cp.v20i1.4859

Authors

Paul Ruiz University of the Republic of Uruguay https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3180-9614
Agostina Barey Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra; CONICET https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1271-7451
Angelina Pilatti Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas; CONICET https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7277-0835
Ricardo Pautassi Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra; Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; CONICET https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1876-2321

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v20i1.4859

Keywords:

THC, Uruguay, pharmacies, consumption

Abstract

Introduction: Uruguay became the first country to regulate the commercialization of cannabis, offering three legal outlets: home cultivation, cannabis clubs, and pharmacies. Despite this, black-market sources remain popular. This observational (survey-based), cross-sectional study assessed the association of age, sex, and cannabis acquisition sources with patterns of cannabis use and consequences among Uruguayan residents, as well as on psychological distress, protective behavioral strategies (PBS), and cannabis use motives. We also tested the atemporal, contemporary, sequential mediation of motives and PBS in the association between distress and the cannabis outcomes. Method: People who use cannabis selected via a non-probabilistic, convenience sample (N = 928, M_age = 30.4 years), completed a survey assessing frequency, potency, consequences, and related psychological variables. Results: Cannabis clubs were the most common legal source and were associated with higher use (p < .001, η²p = .04) and increased risk of cannabis use disorder (p < .05, V = .08). Those who relied on illicit sources reported greater psychological distress and use of high-potency cannabis. Distress was indirectly associated with frequency and consequences via coping motives and reduced PBS. Conclusions: Gaps in access to potent legal cannabis may drive continued illicit use. Psychological distress is a key factor in cannabis-related harm. Interventions should address high-potency demand and promote harm-reduction strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agresti, A. (2013). Categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Alvarez, E., Queirolo, R., & Sotto, B. (2023). Conflicting forces in the implementation of medicinal cannabis regulation in Uruguay. Journal of Cannabis Research, 5(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-023-00189-6

Aranguren, M. (2010). Adaptación argentina de la Escala de Malestar Psicológico de Kessler (K10). Revista de Psicología, 28(2), 308-340. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201002.005

Arnett, J. (2005). The developmental context of substance use in emerging adulthood. Journal of Drug Issues, 35, 235-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260503500202

Boidi, M. F., Queirolo, R., & Cruz, J. M. (2016). Cannabis consumption patterns among frequent consumers in Uruguay. Interantional Journal of Drug Policy, 34, 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.05.008

Bravo, A. J., Pearson, M. R., Pilatti, A., Mezquita, L., & Cross-Cultural Addictions Study, T. (2019). Negative marijuana-related consequences among college students in five countries: measurement invariance of the Brief Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire. Addiction, 114(10), 1854-1865. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14646

Cadenas, N., Rosendo, E., & Brasesco, M. V. (2016). Validación Estadística de la Escala CAST.

Carlini, B. H., & Schauer, G. L. (2022). Cannabis-only use in the USA: prevalence, demographics, use patterns, and health indicators. Journal of Cannabis Research, 4(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-022-00143-y

Cheetham, A., Allen, N. B., Yücel, M., & Lubman, D. I. (2010). The role of affective dysregulation in drug addiction. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(6), 621-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.005

Cuttler, C., Mischley, L. K., & Sexton, M. (2016). Sex differences in cannabis use and effects: A cross-sectional survey of cannabis users. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 1(1), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2016.0010

Davison, A., & Kuonen, D. (2003). An introduction to the bootstrap with applications in R. Statisticial Computing and Statistical Graphics Newsletter, 13.

Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, 63(7), 591-601. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.591

Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. 18(3), 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x

Herchenroeder, L., Mezquita, L., Bravo, A. J., Pilatti, A., Prince, M. A., & Study Team, C. A. (2022). A cross-national examination of cannabis protective behavioral strategies' role in the relationship between Big Five personality traits and cannabis outcomes. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 48(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2021.1919689

Instituto de Regulación y Control del Cannabis, Observatorio Uruguayo de Drogas & Junta Nacional de Drogas. (2023). Mercado regulado del cannabis (Informe XVII, 31/12/2023). https://acortar.link/dCzTPA

Laqueur, H., Rivera-Aguirre, A., Shev, A., Castillo-Carniglia, A., Rudolph, K. E., Ramirez, J., Martins, S. S., & Cerdá, M. (2020). The impact of cannabis legalization in Uruguay on adolescent cannabis use. International Journal of Drug Policy, 80, 102748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102748

Luciano, M. T., Acuff, S. F., McDevitt-Murphy, M. E., & Murphy, J. G. (2020). Behavioral economics and coping-related drinking motives in trauma exposed drinkers: Implications for the self-medication hypothesis. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 28(3), 265-270. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000318

Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23

Maxwell, S. E., Cole, D. A., & Mitchell, M. A. (2011). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: Partial and complete mediation under an autoregressive model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(5), 816-841. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.606716

Mezquita, L., Bravo, A. J., Pilatti, A., Ortet, G., Ibáñez, M. I., & Cross-Cultural Addictions Study Team (2022). Quantifying cannabis problems among college students from English and Spanish speaking countries: Cross-cultural validation of the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R). Addictive Behaviors, 127, 107209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107209

Mezquita, L., Ruiz-Valero, L., Martínez-Gómez, N., Ibáñez, M. I., & Ortet, G. (2019). Desarrollo y validación de la versión breve del cuestionario de motivos de consumo de marihuana (MMM SF). Adicciones, 31(2), 106-116. https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.979

Montgomery, Z. L., Michelini, Y., Bravo, A. J., Pilatti, A., & Mezquita, L. (2024). Substance use motives as mediators of the associations between self-control constructs and negative substance use consequences: A cross-cultural examination. Cannabis, 7(2), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis/2024/000211

O’Laughlin, K. D., Martin, M. J., & Ferrer, E. (2018). Cross-sectional analysis of longitudinal mediation processes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(3), 375-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1454822

Pardo, B. (2014). Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: A comparative analysis of Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(4), 727-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.010

Pilatti, A., Correa, P., Michelini, Y., Bravo, A. J., Pacini, G., & Pautassi, R. M. (2024). The association between mindfulness facets and substance use via emotional psychopathology and coping motives in Argentinian college students. Substance Use & Misuse, 59(12), 1731-1742. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2370026

Pilatti, A., Correa, P., Rivarola Montejano, G., Michelini, Y., Bravo, A. J., & Pautassi, R. M. (2024). Positive and negative pathways linking depressive symptoms to problematic alcohol use among Argentinian college students: An examination of positive and negative urgency traits and internal drinking motives. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2024.2405677

Queirolo, R., Boidi, M. F., & Cruz, J. M. (2016). Cannabis clubs in Uruguay: The challenges of regulation. International Journal of Drug Policy, 34, 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.05.015

Richards, D. K., Schwebel, F. J., Bravo, A. J., & Pearson, M. R. (2021). A comparison of cannabis protective behavioral strategies use across cultures and sex. Addictive Behaviors, 120, 106966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106966

Ruiz, P., Pilatti, A., & Pautassi, R. M. (2020). Consequences of alcohol use, and its association with psychological distress, sensitivity to emotional contagion and age of onset of alcohol use, in Uruguayan youth with or without college degree. Alcohol, 82, 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2019.09.001

Ruiz, P., & Pautassi, R. M. (2023). Malestar psicológico y su relación con edad, sexo, trabajo, estudio, zona de residencia, en jóvenes uruguayos. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 41. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.12731

Simons, J. S., Dvorak, R. D., Merrill, J. E., & Read, J. P. (2012). Dimensions and severity of marijuana consequences: development and validation of the Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire (MACQ). Addictive Behaviors, 37(5), 613-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.01.008

Xing, J., & Shi, Y. (2024). Cannabis consumers’ preferences for legal and illegal cannabis: evidence from a discrete choice experiment. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 2397. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19640-1