SELF-REGULATED LEARNING AND READING COMPREHENSION: AN INTERVENTION STUDY

Authors

  • Daniel Trías Universidad Católica del Uruguay
  • Juan Antonio Huertas Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v3i1.133

Keywords:

self-regulated learning, reading comprehension, motivation

Abstract

The purpose of this intervention study is to assess the impact of teaching self-regulatory learning on reading comprehension and self-regulatory strategies.  Eighty-one high school students from the city of Montevideo participated in the study.  A quasi-experimental design was used; the experimental condition involved teaching a self-regulation strategy in the classroom over nine hours of regular classroom time.  The control group was taught the same material by the same teacher with no self-regulation training intervention. Reading comprehension was assessed before and after the intervention, using questionnaires.  Upon completion of the intervention, a think-aloud procedure was used in order to evaluate students’ use of self-regulation strategies.  Subjects in the experimental group achieved significantly higher levels of reading comprehension.  In addition, those students in the experimental group with lower academic performance especially benefited.  In the experimental group, subjects exhibited self-regulation behaviors.  The scopes of the utilized methodology and its potential for use in educational contexts are discussed.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. The journal of educational research, 97, 4, 171-184.

Alonso-Tapia, J. & Carriedo, N. (2002). El entrenamiento de la comprensión lectora. En Corral, A. (coord.). Psicología del aprendizaje de textos. Madrid: UNED.

Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-Regulation in the Classroom: A Perspective on Assessment and Intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199-231.

Braten, I. & Samuelstuen, M. (2004). Does the influence of reading purpose on reports of strategic text processing depend on students’ topic knowledge? Journal of educational psychology, 96, 2, 324-336.

Butler, D.; Beckingham, B. & Novak, H. (2005). Promoting strategic learning by eighth-grade students struggling in mathematics: a report of three case studies. Learning disabilities research & practice, 20, 3, 156-174.

Cerdán, R. (2007). Estrategias de lectura y contestación a preguntas con textos múltiples: Un estudio de pensamiento en voz alta. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 30(1), 55-71.

Cerdán, R., & E. Vidal-Abarca. (2008). The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 209-222.

Eme, E., Puustinen, M., & Coutelet,B. (2006). Individual and developmental differences in reading monitoring: when and how do children evaluate their comprehension? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 1, 91-115.

Fuchs, L.; Fuchs, D.; Prentice, K.; Burch, M.; Hamlett, C.; Owen, R. & Schroeter, K. (2003). Enhancing third-grade students’ mathematical problem solving with self-regulates learning strategies. Journal of educational psychology, 95, 2, 306-315.

Guasch, T., & Castelló, M. (2002). Aproximación a la enseñanza de la toma de apuntes en la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria: un estudio descriptivo. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 25, 2, 169-181.

Kitsantas, A. (2002). Test preparation and performance: a self-regulatory análisis. The journal of experimental education, 70, 2, 101-113.

Mason, L. (2004). Explicit Self-Regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 2, 283-296.

Mateos, M. (2001). Metacognición y educación. Buenos Aires: Aique.

Nietfeld, J.; L. Cao & J. Osborne. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The journal of experimental education, 74, 1, 7-28.

Onwuegbuzie, A.; J. Slate & R. Schwartz. (2001). Role of study skills in graduate-level educational research courses. The journal of educational research, 94, 4, 238-246. Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom Applications of Research on Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.

Pintrich, P. (2003). A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686.

Pozo, J. I. (2008). Aprendices y maestros. La psicología cognitiva del aprendizaje. 2da Ed. Madrid: Alianza.

Roeschl-Heils, A.; Schneider, W., & van Kraayenoord, C. (2003). Reading, metacognition and motivation: a follow-up study of german students in grades 7 and 8. European journal of psychology of education, 18, 1, 75-86.

Sungur, S. & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Effects of problem-based learning and tradicional instruction on self-regulated learning. The journal of educational research, 99, 5, 307-317.

Thiede, K.; Anderson, M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of educational psychology, 2003, 95, 1, 66-73.

Torrance, M.; Fidalgo, R., & García, J. (2007). The teachability and effectiveness of cognitive self-regulation in sixth-grade writers. Learning and instruction, 17, 265-285.

Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. En Boekaerts, M., P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (eds.) Handbook of self-regulation. New York: Academic Press.

Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.

Published

2009-05-30

How to Cite

Trías, D., & Huertas, J. A. (2009). SELF-REGULATED LEARNING AND READING COMPREHENSION: AN INTERVENTION STUDY. Ciencias Psicológicas, 3(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v3i1.133

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Similar Articles

<< < 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.