El núcleo de la tríada oscura predice el ambientalismo a través de la orientación de dominancia social
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v17i2.2891Palabras clave:
ambientalismo, personalidad, tríada oscura, orientación a la dominancia socialResumen
El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo verificar el papel mediador de la orientación a la dominancia social en la relación entre el núcleo de la tríada oscura y el ambientalismo. Participaron 305 personas con edades comprendidas entre 18 y 77 años (Medad = 26,4; DEedad = 11,25; 59,7 % mujeres). Los resultados indicaron que, entre los 8 rasgos de personalidad analizados considerando los modelos Big Five y Dark Triad, solo la psicopatía se correlacionó con el ambientalismo, que se correlacionó moderadamente con la orientación a la dominancia social. Considerando que los tres rasgos oscuros comparten déficits empáticos, baja amabilidad y honestidad/humildad, se probó el efecto del núcleo de la tríada oscura para la predicción del ambientalismo y se observaron efectos directos. Sin embargo, tales efectos directos no fueron estadísticamente significativos con la inclusión de la orientación a la dominancia social, configurando una mediación completa, ya que el núcleo oscuro predice indirectamente el ambientalismo. Por lo tanto, se observa que la dominancia social funciona como un mecanismo que permite a las personas con rasgos oscuros no preocuparse por el medio ambiente y explotarlo en beneficio propio.
Descargas
Citas
Baldwin, M., & Lammers, J. (2016). Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 14953-14957. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610834113
Book, A., Visser, B. A., & Volk, A. A. (2015). Unpacking “evil”: Claiming the core of the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.016
De la Ossa, C. T. A. (2021). Habilidades intelectuais e suas interfaces neurocognitivas em crianças e adolescentes expostos ao mercúrio [Dissertação de Mestrado não publicada]. Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso.
Desrochers, J. E., Albert, G., Milfont, T. L., Kelly, B., & Arnocky, S. (2019). Does personality mediate the relationship between sex and environmentalism? Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 204-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.026
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2016). Personality, ideological attitudes, and group identity as predictors of political behavior in majority and minority ethnic groups. Political Psychology, 37, 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12222
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Merting, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
Feng, X., Merow, C., Liu, Z., Park, D. S., Roehrdanz, P. R., Maitner, B., Newman, E. A., Boyle, B. L., Lien, A., Burger, J. R., Pires, M. M., Brando, P. M., Bush, M. B., McMichael, C. N. H., Neves, D. M., Nikolopoulos, E. I., Saleska, S. R., Hannah, L., Breshears, D. D., … Enquist, B. J. (2021). How deregulation, drought and increasing fire impact Amazonian biodiversity. Nature, 597(7877), 516-521. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03876-7
Gentile, B., Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Reidy, D. E., Zeichner, A., & Campbell, W. K. (2013). A Test of Two Brief Measures of Grandiose Narcissism: The Narcissistic Personality Inventory-13 and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory-16. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1120-1136. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033192
Gouveia, V. V., Monteiro, R. P., Gouveia, R. S. V., Athayde, R. A. A., & Cavalcanti, T. M. (2016). Assessing the dark side of personality: Psychometric evidences of the dark triad dirty dozen. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 50(3), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v50i3.126
Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2015). Multivariate Data Analysis (7ª ed.). Prentice Hall.
Hauck-Filho, N., & Teixeira, M. A. P. (2014). Revisiting the psychometric properties of the Levenson Self-Report Psycopathy Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 459-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.865196
Hirsh, J. B., & Dolderman, D. (2007). Personality predictors of consumerism and environmentalism: A preliminary study. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1583-1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.015
Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
Huang, N., Zuo, S., Wang, F., Cai, P., & Wang, F. (2019). Environmental attitudes in China: The roles of the Dark Triad, future orientation and place attachment. International Journal of Psychology, 54, 563-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12518
Jonason, P. K., Okan, C., & Özsoy, E. (2019). The dark triad traits in Australia and Turkey. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 123-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.058
Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., Visser, B. A., & Gallucci, A. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty-Humility. European Journal of Personality, 27, 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1860
Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.151
Mertens, A., von Krause, M., Denk, A., & Heitz, T. (2021). Gender differences in eating behavior and environmental attitudes-The mediating role of the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110359
Milfont, T. L. (2021). Where does pro-environmental tendencies fit within a taxonomy of personality traits? Em A. Frazen & S. Mader (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Sociology (pp. 97-115). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The big five personality traits and environmental engagement: Associations at the individual and societal level. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.006
Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2014). The hierarchy enforcement hypothesis of environmental exploitation: A social dominance perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 188-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.006
Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2016). Empathic and social dominance orientations help explain gender differences in environmentalism: A one-year Bayesian mediation analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 85-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.044
Milfont, T. L., Bain, P. G., Kashima, Y., Corral-Verdugo, V., Pasquali, C., Johansson, L.-O., Guan, Y., Gouveia, V. V., Garðarsdóttir, R. B., Doron, G., Bilewicz, M., Utsugi, A., Aragones, J. I., Steg, L., Soland, M., Park, J., Otto, S., Demarque, C., Wagner, C., … Einarsdóttir, G. (2017). On the relation between social dominance orientation and environmentalism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(7), 802-814. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722832
Milfont, T. L., Richter, I., Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Fischer, R. (2013). Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, https://doi.org/1127-1138. 10.1177/0146167213490805
Monaghan, C., Bizumic, B., & Sellbom, M. (2016). The role of Machiavellian views and tactics in psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.002
Monteiro, R. P. (2017). Tríade sombria da personalidade: conceitos, medição e correlatos [Tese de Doutorado]. Universidade Federal da Paraíba.
Monteiro, R. P., Coelho, G. L. H., Cavalcanti, T. M., Grangeiro, A. S. M., & Gouveia, V. V. (2022). The ends justify the means? Psychometric parameters of the MACH-IV, the two-dimensional MACH-IV and the trimmed MACH in Brazil. Current Psychology, 41, 4088-4098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00892-0
Palinkas, L. A., & Wong, M. (2020). Global climate change and mental health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 12-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.023
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
Perry, R., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). Big-Five personality prospectively predicts social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.009
Pires, P., Ribas Junior, R. C., Hora, G., Filgueiras, A. & Lopes, D. (2016). Psychometric properties for the Brazilian version of the New Ecological Paradigm revised. Temas em Psicologia, 24, 1407-1419. https://dx.doi.org/10.9788/TP2016.4-12
Rocha, L. R. L. (2016). A correlação entre doenças respiratórias e o incremento das queimadas em Alta Floresta e Peixoto de Azevedo norte do Mato Grosso-Amazônia Legal. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, 6, 246-254. https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v6i1.3484
Soper, D. (2023, outubro 12). Free Statistics Calculators (version 4.0). Statistics Calculators. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=89
Stanley, S. K., Wilson, M. S., & Milfont, T. L. (2021). Social dominance as an ideological barrier to environmental engagement: Qualitative and quantitative insights. Global Environmental Change, 67, 102223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102223
Tomas, W. M., Berlinck, C. N., Chiaravalloti, R. M., Faggioni, G. P., Strüssmann, C., Libonati, R., Abrahão, C. R., do Valle Alvarenga, G., de Faria Bacellar, A. E., de Queiroz Batista, F. R., Bornato, T. S., Camilo, A. R., Castedo, J., Fernando, A. M. E., de Freitas, G. O., Garcia, C. M., Gonçalves, H. S., de Freitas Guilherme, M. B., Layme, V. M. G., … Morato, R. (2021). Distance sampling surveys reveal 17 million vertebrates directly killed by the 2020’s wildfires in the Pantanal, Brazil. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02844-5
Ucar, G. K., Malatyalı, M. K., Planalı, G. Ö., & Kanik, B. (2023). Personality and pro-environmental engagements: the role of the Dark Triad, the Light Triad, and value orientations. Personality and Individual Differences, 203, 112036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.112036
Veloso Gouveia, V., de Carvalho Rodrigues Araújo, R., Vasconcelos de Oliveira, I. C., Pereira Gonçalves, M., Milfont, T., Lins de Holanda Coelho, G., Santos, W., De Medeiros, E. D., Silva Soares, A. K., Pereira Monteiro, R., Moura de Andrade, J., Medeiros Cavalcanti, T., Da Silva Nascimento, B., & Gouveia, R. (2021). A short version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-20): evidence on construct validity. Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 55(1), e1312. https://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v55i1.1312
Vilanova, F., Soares, D., de Quadros Duarte, M., & Costa, Â. B. (2022). Evidências de Validade da Escala de Orientação à Dominância Social no Brasil. Psico-USF, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712024270303
Wai, M., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2012). The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 794-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.008
Wu, W., Wang, H., Lee, H.-Y., Lin, Y.-T., & Guo, F. (2019). How Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism affect sustainable entrepreneurial orientation: The moderating effect of psychological resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00779
Zelezny, L. C., & Schultz, P. W. (2000). Psychology of promoting environmentalism: promoting environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00172
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Universidad Católica del Uruguay
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Se ceden los derechos de reproducción del artículo según la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), sistema de acceso abierto.
