La fragmentación de la teoría general del contrato en el Anteproyecto de Código Civil y Comercial de la República Argentina de marzo de 2012.

Carlos de Cores

doi:10.22235/rd.v0i7.787

The fragmentation of the general theory of contract in the Draft Civil and Commercial Code of the Argentine Republic of March 2012.

Authors

Carlos de Cores Universidad Católica del Uruguay (UCU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v0i7.787

Keywords:

contracts, preliminary draft of the code civil and comercial argentino, constitutionalization of private law, sources of law, interpretation of law, legal business, contract of adhesion, consumer contract

Abstract

Abstract. This work is part of a broader investigation into the current general theory of contracts, from the changes that have occurred in this legal Institute in recent years. It analyzes in particular – taking as leiv motiv the preliminary draft of the code Civil y Comercial Argentino – the tendency to unify the contracts, to prioritize an attitude that
well can be called a “Constitutionalist” by the judges in applying the law, the reference to the sources of the law, etc.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Carlos de Cores, Universidad Católica del Uruguay (UCU)

Abogado, director del Departamento de Derecho Civil de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Católica del Uruguay

Downloads

PDF (Español (España))

Published

2016-01-28

How to Cite

de Cores, C. (2016). The fragmentation of the general theory of contract in the Draft Civil and Commercial Code of the Argentine Republic of March 2012. Revista De Derecho, (7), 65–113. https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v0i7.787

Download Citation

Issue

No. 7 (2012): Revista de Derecho

Section

Doctrine

License

This publication is attached to the Creative Commons policy.

Political: this magazine provides an access open immediate to its content, based on the principle of that offer to the public an access free to them research helps to a higher Exchange global of knowledge.

Edition covered Dec. 218 / 96. Committee on the role. The reproduction total or partial in form identical or modified written to machine, by the system multigraph, mimeograph, printed, photocopy, scanner, media electronic, etc. not authorized by them editors violates rights reserved. Any use must be requested previously. Them opinions poured by the authors in their articles not reflect necessarily the seem of the Faculty of psychology of the University Catholic of the Uruguay.