Legal Neo rhetoric.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v0i10.740Keywords:
rhetoric, argumentation, law, trialAbstract
Abstract:The present paper provides a categorization and hierarchy of the various stylistic stages in which rhetoric has been presented in time, to effect of contrasting with the concept proposed in the article in a new way to understand and build the discourse in a judicial dispute, based on the concept of “rationality” understood as argumentative discourse. To this new way of conceiving the legal rationality, the author calls it “Neo rhetoric”.
Downloads
References
ANSCOMBRE, Jean-Claude; Ducrot, Oswald. La argumentación en la lengua. Editorial Gredos, Madrid, 1994.
ARISTÓTELES. Retórica. Editorial Gredos, Madrid, 2000.
CICERÓN, Marco Tulio. De la invención retórica. UNAM, México, 1990. Grupo U. Retórica General. Ediciones Paidós ibérica, Barcelona, 1987.
LAUSBERG, Heinrich. Manual de retórica literaria. Fundamentos de una ciencia de la literatura.
Editorial Gredos, Madrid, 1983.
PLATÓN. Diálogos. Editorial Porrúa, México, 1998.
RICOEUR, Paul. La metáfora viva. Editorial Trotta, Ediciones cristiandad, Madrid, 2001.
SCHANCE, Helmut. Retórica. Contribuciones sobre su historia en Alemania. Siglo XVI a XX. Editorial Alfa Argentina, Buenos Aires, 1976.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. La ciencia del texto. Editorial Paidós, Barcelona,1978.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This publication is attached to the Creative Commons policy.
Political: this magazine provides an access open immediate to its content, based on the principle of that offer to the public an access free to them research helps to a higher Exchange global of knowledge.
Edition covered Dec. 218 / 96. Committee on the role. The reproduction total or partial in form identical or modified written to machine, by the system multigraph, mimeograph, printed, photocopy, scanner, media electronic, etc. not authorized by them editors violates rights reserved. Any use must be requested previously. Them opinions poured by the authors in their articles not reflect necessarily the seem of the Faculty of psychology of the University Catholic of the Uruguay.