Judicial decision’s context and its special importance when deciding in equity or ex aequo et bono
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/rd23.2543Keywords:
judicial ethics, judicial decision, equity, context of the decisionAbstract
The purpose of this work is about some considerations made about the ethical and normative context conditions that should be present in order to courts could decide grounding their decisions on principles, specifically that of equity, to resolve issues submitted for their consideration. Through this article, it will be analyzed how equity presents several particular characteristics that bear and provide special relevance to the normative and ethical conditions of the jurisdictional function in order to ensure that the judicial aware reckon with a minimum of instrumental rationality. The analysis and work prepared by Jesús Vega, who critically studies the visions of equity outlined by Ferrajoli and Aristóteles, will be used as the main guide (work tool).
Downloads
References
Amaya Navarro, M. A. (2009). Virtudes judiciales y argumentación. Una aproximación a la ética jurídica. México: Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación
Atienza, M. & Ruiz Manero, J. (2007). Las piezas del Derecho. Teoría de los enunciados jurídicos. Barcelona: Ariel.
Código Iberoamericano de Ética Judicial (CIEJ) aprobado en la XVII Reunión Plenaria de la Cumbre Judicial Iberoamericana el 2 de abril de 2014.
González Lagier, D. (2013). Quaestio facti. Ensayos sobre prueba, causalidad y acción. México: Fontamara.
Vega, J. (2013). La equidad según Ferrajoli y la equidad según Aristóteles: una comparación crítica. Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, 0(36), 229-273. doi: https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA2013.36.11
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This publication is attached to the Creative Commons policy.
Political: this magazine provides an access open immediate to its content, based on the principle of that offer to the public an access free to them research helps to a higher Exchange global of knowledge.
Edition covered Dec. 218 / 96. Committee on the role. The reproduction total or partial in form identical or modified written to machine, by the system multigraph, mimeograph, printed, photocopy, scanner, media electronic, etc. not authorized by them editors violates rights reserved. Any use must be requested previously. Them opinions poured by the authors in their articles not reflect necessarily the seem of the Faculty of psychology of the University Catholic of the Uruguay.
