Legal interpretation and natural law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v0i19.1729Keywords:
legal interpretation, philosophy of law, natural lawAbstract
This article seeks to provide clarity and precision to those who address the issue of legal interpretation, the central concepts of the problem, as well as the notions necessarily alleged by the phenomenon of legal interpretation. It is inserted in the framework of a research of greater scope, in development.
Downloads
References
Aristóteles, Metafísica, Ed. V. García Yebra, Madrid: Gredos 1970.
Aristóteles, Categorías, Ed. J. Mittelmann, Buenos Aires: Losada, 2009.
Betti, E., Teoria generale della interpretazione, 2 Vols., Milano: Giuffrè, 1955.
Bioy Casares, Adolfo, Borges, Barcelona: Planeta, 2011.
Blanché, R., Le raissonnement, Paris: PUF, 1973.
Boyle, P., “Reasons for Action: Evaluative Cognitions that Underlie Motivations”, en The American Journal of Jurisprudence, N° 46 (2001), Notre Dame-Indiana.
Canale, D., Forme del limite nell’interpretazione giudiziale, Padova: CEDAM, 2003.
Casaubon, J.A., Palabras, ideas, cosas. El problema de los universales, Buenos Aire: Candil, 1984.
Finnis, J., Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2a Ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011.
Fuller, L., The Morality of Law, Yale University Press, New Haven & London, 1969.
Gadenne, V., Filosofía de la psicología, trad. D. Romero, Barcelona: Herder, 2006.
Greenberg, M., “Legislation as Communication. Legal Interpretation and the Study of Linguistic Communication”, en AA.VV., Language in the Law, Ed. A. Marmor & S. Soames, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011.
Guastini, R., Estudios sobre interpretación jurídica, Ciudad de México: Porrúa-UNAM, 2003.
Husson, S. (Ed.), Interpréter le De Interpretatione, Paris: Vrin, 2009.
Kalinowski, G., El problema de la verdad en la moral y en el derecho, trad. E. Marí, Buenos Aires: EUDEBA, 1979.
Kalinowski, G., “Filosofía y lógica de la interpretación en derecho”, en Concepto, fundamento y concreción del derecho, trad. C.I. Massini-Correas, Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot, 1982.
Kalinowski, G., La logique deductive. Essai de présentation aux juristes, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1996.
Keys, M., Aquinas, Aristotle, and the Promise of the Common Good, New York. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Llano, A., Teoría del conocimiento, Madrid: BAC, 2015.
Massini-Correas, C.I., Objetividad jurídica e interpretación del derecho, México D.F.: Porrúa, 2008.
Massini-Correas, C.I., Filosofía del derecho - III - El conocimiento y la interpretación jurídica, Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot, 2008b.
Massini Correas, C.I., “Nota sobre el concepto de derecho”, en Sapientia, N° 225-226 (2009), Buenos Aires.
Moore, M.S., “Interpreting Interpretation”, en AA.VV., Law and Interpretation. Essays in Legal Philosophy, Ed. A. Marmor, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995.
O’Callaghan, J.P., Thomistic Realism and the Linguistic Turn, Notre Dame-Indiana, University of Notre Dame Press, 2003.
Palacios, L.E., El análisis y la síntesis, Madrid: Encuentro, 2005.
Porter, J., Nature as Reason. A Thomistic Theory of the Natural Law, Grand Rapids-Michigan/Cambridge-UK, Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2005.
Raz, J., “Why Interpret?”, en Ratio Juris, N° 9-4 (1996), Oxford.
Ricoeur, P., “Qu’est-ce qu’un texte?”, en Du texte à l’action. Essais d’hermeneutique, II, Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1986.
Sanguineti, J.J., El conocimiento humano. Una perspectiva filosófica, Madrid: Palabra, 2005.
Schauer, F., The Force of Law, Cambridge-Massachusetts/London, Harvard University Press, 2015.
Simon, Y.R., Practical Knowledge, New York: Fordham University Press, 1991.
Villa, V., Constructivismo y teorías del derecho, México: UNAM, 2011.
Westberg, D., Right Practical Reason. Aristotle, Action and Prudence in Aquinas, Oxford: Clarendon Press 2002.
Wrôblewski, J., “L’interprétation en droit: théorie et idéologie”, en Archives de Philosophie du Droit, N° XVII (1972), Paris.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This publication is attached to the Creative Commons policy.
Political: this magazine provides an access open immediate to its content, based on the principle of that offer to the public an access free to them research helps to a higher Exchange global of knowledge.
Edition covered Dec. 218 / 96. Committee on the role. The reproduction total or partial in form identical or modified written to machine, by the system multigraph, mimeograph, printed, photocopy, scanner, media electronic, etc. not authorized by them editors violates rights reserved. Any use must be requested previously. Them opinions poured by the authors in their articles not reflect necessarily the seem of the Faculty of psychology of the University Catholic of the Uruguay.
