Subjective Element of Crime: A Skeptic Reading from Kant

Authors

  • Diego Pérez Lasserre Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chiles

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v1i15.1380

Keywords:

criminal law, causalistas and finalists, Kant, freedom.

Abstract

The present article intends to review the discussion between causalists and finalists in Criminal Law from the analysis of the freedom that Kant makes in the third antinomy of his Critique of Pure Reason, in order to bring to light the underlying theme in this discussion and to review its attainment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allison, Henry E. Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Allison, Henry E. “Kant on Freedom of the Will”. En Essays on Kant, 137–61. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Cury Urzúa, Enrique. Derecho penal: parte general. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile, 2005.

Engisch, Karl. La teoría de la libertad de la voluntad en la actual doctrina filosófica del derecho penal. Traducido por José Luis Guzmán Dalbora. Valparaíso: Edeval, 2006.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. London & New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.

Guzmán Dalbora, José Luis. “Estudio preliminar”. En La teoría de la libertad de la voluntad en la actual doctrina filosófica del derecho penal, de Karl Engisch. Valparaíso: Edeval, 2006.

Harper, William L, y Ralf Meerbote. Kant on Causality, Freedom, and Objectivity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.

Heidegger, Martin. The essence of human freedom: an introduction to philosophy.

Jakobs, Günther. Dogmática de Derecho penal y la configuración normativa de la sociedad. Madrid: Civitas, 2004.

Kant, Immanuel. Crítica de la Razón Pura. Traducido por Pedro Ribas. Mexico D.F.: Taurus, 2013.

Politoff Lifschitz, Sergio, Jean Pierre Matus Acuña, y María Cecilia Ramírez G. Lecciones de derecho penal chileno: parte general. Editorial Jurídica de Chile, 2004.

Roxin, Claus. Derecho Penal: Parte General. Traducido por Diego-Manuel Luzón Peña, Miguel Díaz y García Conlledo, y Javier de Vicente Remesal. Madrid: Civitas, 1997.

Van Weezel, Alex. “El dolo eventual como espacio de discrecionalidad”. Doctrina y jurisprudencia penal 7 (2011): 23–52

Published

2017-06-12

How to Cite

Pérez Lasserre, D. (2017). Subjective Element of Crime: A Skeptic Reading from Kant. Revista De Derecho, 1(15), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v1i15.1380

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 15 16 17 18 19 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.