Conventionality Control in the Inter-American System of Human Rights IMPLICATIONS IN THE ARGENTINE CONSTITUTIONAL CODE OF LAWS.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v0i6.802Keywords:
human rights, inter-american court of human rights, international law, constitutional law, international conventions on human rights, Argentina, interpretation of the lawAbstract
Abstract. The doctrine of conventionality control has vague contours. The two central themes through which the main lines of conventionality control circulate are the internationality of constitutional law, and the constitutionality of international law. The aim of this paper is to discuss whether in the exercise of the conventionality control the interpretation of the American Convention on Human Rights by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights is binding on our local courts, particulary on the Argentine Supreme Court of Justice. The solution to this question is through the consistent interpretation of the law, applying the large doctrine guidelines where consensus have been set without any
serious difficulties and debates, and acknowledging that complex issues deserve above all an implementation of the normal prudence rules, at least until revealing an enduring doctrine based on the principle of legal certainty.
Downloads
References
ALBANESE, Susana: “La internacionalización del derecho constitucional y la constitucionalización del derecho internacional”, en ALBANESE, Susana (coord.): Control de convencionalidad, Buenos Aires: Ediar, 2008.
BADENI, Gregorio: “Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos y la Corte Suprema de Justicia”, en La Ley, 2009-E, 1018.
BAZAN, Víctor: “Inconstitucionalidad e inconvencionalidad por omisión”, en La Ley, 2009- E, 1240.
BIANCHI, Alberto B.: “Una refl exión sobre el llamado ‘control de convencionalidad’”, en La Ley. Suplemento Derecho Constitucional 2010, 23 de setiembre de 2010, 2010-E, 426.
BIDART CAMPOS, Germán J., y ALBANESE, Susana: “El valor de las recomendaciones de la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos”, en Jurisprudencia Argentina, 1999-II-357.
GELLI, María A.: Constitución de la Nación Argentina. Concordada y comentada, 4.a ed., Buenos Aires: La Ley, 2008.
— “El valor de la jurisprudencia internacional. A propósito del caso ‘Bayarri’ en un dictamen de la Procuración General de la Nación”, en La Ley, Buenos Aires, 1 de junio de 2010.
GIL DOMÍNGUEZ, Andrés: Escritos de neoconstitucionalismo, Buenos Aires: Ediar, 2010.
GOZAÍNI, Osvaldo Alfredo: “El impacto de la jurisprudencia del sistema interamericano en el derecho interno”, en ALBANESE, Susana (coord.): Control de convencionalidad,Buenos Aires: Ediar, 2008.
HITTERS, Juan Carlos: “¿Son vinculantes los pronunciamientos de la Comisión y de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos?”, en La Ley, 2008-E, 1169.
MONCAYO, Guillermo: “Reforma constitucional, derechos humanos y jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema”, en ABREGÚ, Martín, y COURTIS, Christian (comps.): La aplicación de los tratados sobre derechos humanos por los tribunales locales, Buenos Aires: CELS y Editores del Puerto, 1997.
SAGÜÉS, Néstor P. “El control de convencionalidad. En particular sobre las Constituciones Nacionales”, en La Ley, 2009-B, 761.
— “Dificultades operativas del ‘control de convencionalidad’ en el sistema interamericano”, en La Ley, 11 de agosto de 2010.
TRAVIESO, Juan A. “Los nuevos paradigmas. Enfoques con nuevas consideraciones metodológicas”,en ABREGÚ, Martín, y COURTIS, Christian (comps.): La aplicación de
los tratados sobre derechos humanos por los tribunales locales, Buenos Aires: CELS y Editores del Puerto, 1997.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This publication is attached to the Creative Commons policy.
Political: this magazine provides an access open immediate to its content, based on the principle of that offer to the public an access free to them research helps to a higher Exchange global of knowledge.
Edition covered Dec. 218 / 96. Committee on the role. The reproduction total or partial in form identical or modified written to machine, by the system multigraph, mimeograph, printed, photocopy, scanner, media electronic, etc. not authorized by them editors violates rights reserved. Any use must be requested previously. Them opinions poured by the authors in their articles not reflect necessarily the seem of the Faculty of psychology of the University Catholic of the Uruguay.
