Subjective Element of Crime: A Skeptic Reading from Kant
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v1i15.1380Keywords:
criminal law, causalistas and finalists, Kant, freedom.Abstract
The present article intends to review the discussion between causalists and finalists in Criminal Law from the analysis of the freedom that Kant makes in the third antinomy of his Critique of Pure Reason, in order to bring to light the underlying theme in this discussion and to review its attainment.Downloads
References
Allison, Henry E. Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Allison, Henry E. “Kant on Freedom of the Will”. En Essays on Kant, 137–61. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Cury Urzúa, Enrique. Derecho penal: parte general. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile, 2005.
Engisch, Karl. La teoría de la libertad de la voluntad en la actual doctrina filosófica del derecho penal. Traducido por José Luis Guzmán Dalbora. Valparaíso: Edeval, 2006.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. London & New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.
Guzmán Dalbora, José Luis. “Estudio preliminar”. En La teoría de la libertad de la voluntad en la actual doctrina filosófica del derecho penal, de Karl Engisch. Valparaíso: Edeval, 2006.
Harper, William L, y Ralf Meerbote. Kant on Causality, Freedom, and Objectivity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
Heidegger, Martin. The essence of human freedom: an introduction to philosophy.
Jakobs, Günther. Dogmática de Derecho penal y la configuración normativa de la sociedad. Madrid: Civitas, 2004.
Kant, Immanuel. Crítica de la Razón Pura. Traducido por Pedro Ribas. Mexico D.F.: Taurus, 2013.
Politoff Lifschitz, Sergio, Jean Pierre Matus Acuña, y María Cecilia Ramírez G. Lecciones de derecho penal chileno: parte general. Editorial Jurídica de Chile, 2004.
Roxin, Claus. Derecho Penal: Parte General. Traducido por Diego-Manuel Luzón Peña, Miguel Díaz y García Conlledo, y Javier de Vicente Remesal. Madrid: Civitas, 1997.
Van Weezel, Alex. “El dolo eventual como espacio de discrecionalidad”. Doctrina y jurisprudencia penal 7 (2011): 23–52
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This publication is attached to the Creative Commons policy.
Political: this magazine provides an access open immediate to its content, based on the principle of that offer to the public an access free to them research helps to a higher Exchange global of knowledge.
Edition covered Dec. 218 / 96. Committee on the role. The reproduction total or partial in form identical or modified written to machine, by the system multigraph, mimeograph, printed, photocopy, scanner, media electronic, etc. not authorized by them editors violates rights reserved. Any use must be requested previously. Them opinions poured by the authors in their articles not reflect necessarily the seem of the Faculty of psychology of the University Catholic of the Uruguay.
