Análise das propriedades psicométricas do Questionário de Estratégias de Autorregulação Motivacional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v19i1.4188Palavras-chave:
autorregulação, motivação, estudantes universitários, Propriedades Psicométricas, QEAMResumo
A autorregulação motivacional permite aos estudantes manterem e/ou melhorarem sua motivação para alcançar suas metas. Essa autorregulação está relacionada com variáveis relevantes, como o desempenho acadêmico, o clima de sala de aula e a procrastinação acadêmica, entre outras. O Questionário de Estratégias de Autorregulação Motivacional (QEAM) operacionaliza o construto e foi adaptado em Córdoba (Argentina), dividindo as dimensões da regulação de metas de acordo com as estratégias empregadas, sejam elas por aproximação ou evitação. Esta pesquisa propõe analisar novas evidências de validade e confiabilidade do QEAM. Participaram 412 estudantes universitários de Buenos Aires (Argentina). A análise da estrutura interna do instrumento, por meio da análise fatorial confirmatória (AFC), e da análise exploratória de equações estruturais (ESEM) verificou o melhor ajuste para o modelo de oito fatores. Em seguida, uma análise de invariância fatorial entre amostras de estudantes de Buenos Aires e Córdoba verificou a equivalência métrica do QEAM. A consistência interna das dimensões foi adequada (> 0,70). Em seguida, o teste de validade concorrente revelou correlações positivas e significativas com as abordagens de aprendizagem e correlações negativas com a procrastinação acadêmica. As normas estatísticas também foram estimadas. Este trabalho fornece novas evidências sobre as propriedades psicométricas do QEAM e escalas que permitem seu uso e interpretação no campo de aplicação.
Downloads
Referências
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA.
Arenas-Wong, M. M., Rivero-Panaqué, C. R., & Navarro-Fernández, R. J. (2022). Procrastinación académica y tipos de motivación en estudiantes de una universidad de Lima Metropolitana. Revista Peruana de Investigación Educativa, 16, 35-61. https://doi.org/10.34236/rpie.v14i16.286
Barrios, M., & Cosculluela, A. (2013). Fiabilidad. En J. Meneses (Ed.), Psicometría (pp. 84-102). UOC.
Chicco, D., Warrens, M. J., & Jurman, G. (2021). The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e623. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.623
Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (2005). Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60(2), 170-180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.170
Dayupay, J. P., Velos, S. P., Go, M. B., Cababat, F. G., & Golbin, R. A. (2022). College students’ motivational strategies, study skills, and mathematics performance: a structural model. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(5), 2246-6264.
Doval, E., Viladrich, C., & Angulo-Brunet, A. (2023). Coeficiente Alfa: la resistencia de un clásico. Psicothema, 35(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2022.321
Elizondo, K., Valenzuela, R., Pestana, J. V., & Codina, N. (2023). Self‐regulation and procrastination in college students: A tale of motivation, strategy, and perseverance. Psychology in the Schools, 61(3), 887-902. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23088
Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613-628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.613
Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Tait, H. (2013). Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50390092_Approaches_to_learning_and_studying_inventory_ASSIST_3rd_edition
Fong, C. J., Altan, S., Gonzales, C., Kirmizi, M., Adelugba, S. F., & Kim, Y. (2024). Stay motivated and carry on: A meta-analytic investigation of motivational regulation strategies and academic achievement, motivation, and self-regulation correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(6), 997-1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000886
Freiberg-Hoffmann, A., Romero-Medina, A., López-Fernández, B., & Fernández-Liporace, M. (2023). Learning approaches: Cross-cultural differences (Spain–Argentina) and academic achievement in college students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 26. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2023.15
Freiberg-Hoffmann, A., Stover, J., de la Iglesia, G., & Fernández-Liporace, M. (2013). Correlaciones policóricas y tetracóricas en estudios factoriales exploratorios y confirmatorios. Ciencias Psicológicas, 7(2), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v7i1.1057
Góes, N. M., & Boruchovitch, E. (2017). Escala de avaliação das estratégias de regulação da motivação de alunos universitários: um estudo piloto. Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación, 169-173. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.0.01.2488
Guo, G., & Tang, Z. (2022). Quantitative research on online English learning motivational regulation strategies of undergraduate English majors. Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research, 2(1), 327. https://doi.org/10.56028/aehssr.2.1.327
Hendrie-Kupczyszyn, K. N., & Bastacini, M. D. C. (2019). Autorregulación en estudiantes universitarios: Estrategias de aprendizaje, motivación y emociones. Revista Educación, 29. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.37713
Jordan-Muiños, F. (2021). Cut-off value of the fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis. Psocial, 7(1), 66-71.
Kim, Y., Brady, A. C., & Wolters, C. A. (2018). Development and validation of the Brief Regulation of Motivation Scale. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.12.010
Kryshko, O., Fleischer, J., Waldeyer, J., Wirth, J., & Leutner, D. (2020). Do motivational regulation strategies contribute to university students’ academic success? Learning and Individual Differences, 82, 101912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101912
Millsap, R. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. Routledge.
Panayides, P. (2013). Coefficient Alpha: Interpret with caution. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 687-696. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v9i4.653
Park, H.-S. (2021). Validation of Motivational Regulation Strategies for Korean elementary, middle, and high school Students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(3), 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00558-w
Paulino, P., Sá, I., & Lopes da Silva, A. (2015). Crenças e estratégias da motivação na aprendizagem: Desenvolvimento de uma escala. Psychologica, 58(1), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_58-1_4
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
Rojas, L., Rojas, G., & Brizuela, A. (2018). The use of measurement invariance with dichotomous variables as evidence of validity. Evaluar, 18(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v18.n2.20807
Rojas-Ospina, T., & Valencia-Serrano, M. (2019). Adaptación y validación de un cuestionario sobre estrategias de autorregulación de la motivación en estudiantes universitarios. Psykhe, 28(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.28.1.1128
Rojas-Ospina, T., & Valencia-Serrano, M. (2021). Estrategias de autorregulación de la motivación de estudiantes universitarios y su relación con el ambiente de clase en asignaturas de matemáticas. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 24(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.5
Salgado, J. A., Lería, F. J., Pilar Franco, M. E., Gajardo, X. R., & Olivares, M. V. (2017). Efecto de la motivación sobre la profundidad en los procesos de estudio en universitarios de formación en pedagogía. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2017.15.4.005
Sánchez-Rosas, J. (2015). Validation of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire–Revised in Argentinean university students (A-AGQ-R). International Journal of Psychological Research, 8(1), 10-23. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.641
Sánchez-Rosas, J., Aguirre, R., Bovina-Martijena, N., & Galarza, V. (2019). Motivational regulation strategies: A questionnaire for its measurement in Argentinian university students. Evaluar, 19(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v19.n1.23878
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12784
Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2009). How do motivational regulation strategies affect achievement: Mediated by effort management and moderated by intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 621-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.006
Schwinger, M., von der Laden, T., & Spinath, B. (2007). Motivational regulation strategies and their measurement. Zeitschrift für Entwicklung spsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 39(2), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637.39.2.57
Suárez, J. M., Fernández, A. P., & Zamora, Á. (2018). Academic goals in relation to motivational self-regulation value strategies. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 20(2), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2018.20.2.1689
Tait, H., Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST. A reconceptualization of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. En C. Rust (Ed.), Improving students as learners (pp. 262-271). Oxford Bookes University.
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). Fostering strategic learning: The development and validation of the Writing Strategies for Motivational Regulation Questionnaire (WSMRQ). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0243-4
Tisocco, F., & Fernández Liporace, M. (2021). The Tuckman Procrastination Scale: Psychometric features among Buenos Aires Undergraduates. Psychological Thought, 14(2), 444-466. https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v14i2.603
Tuckman, B. W. (1991). The development and concurrent validity of the procrastination scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(2), 473-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164491512022
Villar, E., Mayo, M. E., Martínez-López, Z., & Tinajero, C. (2024). What are the principal and most effective strategies for motivational self-regulation? A systematic review and meta-analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 113, 102480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102480
Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.224
Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(3), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80004-1
Wolters, C. A., & Benzon, M. B. (2013). Assessing and predicting college students’ use of strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(2), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.699901
Wolters, C. A., & Rosenthal, H. (2000). The relation between students’ motivational beliefs and their use of motivational regulation strategies. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(7), 801-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-0355(00)00051-3
Wolters, C. A., Benzon, M. B., & Arroyo-Giner, C. (2011). Assessing strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. En D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 298–312). Routledge.
Xiong, Z., Xia, H., Ni, J., & Hu, H. (2025). Basic assumptions, core connotations, and path methods of model modification—using confirmatory factor analysis as an example. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1506415
Zoya, S., & Saima, G. (2024). Motivation and academic performance of university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Forman Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1).
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Ciencias Psicológicas

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.