El efecto moderador del castigo percibido sobre la relación entre la tríada oscura y la corrupción
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v18i2.3804Palabras clave:
Corrupción, Triada Oscura, castigo percibido, Modelo Analítico de Corrupción, Brasil, Reino UnidoResumen
El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo investigar el efecto moderador del castigo percibido sobre la relación entre los rasgos de personalidad de la tríada oscura y la corrupción en Brasil (N = 118) y en el Reino Unido (N = 130). Los participantes respondieron a la Escala de la Docena Sucia de la Triada Oscura, así como a medidas de corrupción y castigo percibido. Se encontró que el castigo predice la corrupción en ambos países. En cuanto a los rasgos de la tríada oscura, se identificó una relación entre el maquiavelismo y la corrupción en Brasil y en el Reino Unido, aunque se identificó una interacción con el castigo solo en Brasil. Además, la psicopatía no tuvo relación con la corrupción o el castigo en ninguno de los dos países. Se encontró una relación directa solo en Brasil con el narcisismo, aunque la interacción fue significativa en ambos países. En general, se identificó que el castigo percibido y los rasgos de la tríada oscura contribuyen a la comprensión de la corrupción, a pesar de algunas diferencias en los resultados entre Brasil y el Reino Unido.
Descargas
Citas
Aiken, L. S., & Stephen, W. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage.
Ali, A. S. A. (2020). Delinquency as predicted by dark triad factors and demographic variables. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 661-675. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2020.1711784
Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Treviño, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670-684. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.32465714
Bai, B. Y., Liu, X. X., & Kou, Y. (2014). Belief in a just world lowers perceived intention of corruption: The mediating role of perceived punishment. PLoS ONE, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097075
Bai, B. Y., Liu, X. X., & Kou, Y. (2016). Belief in a just world lowers bribery intention. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(1), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12108
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: an economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394
Cislak, A., Cichocka, A., Wojcik, A. D., & Frankowska, N. (2018). Power corrupts, but control does not: What stands behind the effects of holding high positions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(6), 944-957. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218757456
Collier, M. W. (2002). Explaining corruption: An institutional choice approach. Crime, Law and Social Change, 38(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019802614530
Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2008). The personality of corruption: a national-level analysis. Cross-Cultural Research, 42(4), 353-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397108321904
Coppock, A., Leeper, T. J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2018). Generalizability of heterogeneous treatment effect estimates across samples. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49), 12441-12446. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1808083115
Engström, P., Nordblom, K., Ohlsson, H., & Persson, A. (2015). Tax compliance and loss aversion. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(4), 132-164. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20130134
Frank, B., Li, S., Bühren, C., & Qin, H. (2015). Group decision making in a corruption experiment: China and Germany compared. Jahrbücher Für Nationalökonomie Und Statistik, 235(2), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2015-0207
Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of Personality: A 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
Grolleau, G., Kocher, M. G., & Sutan, A. (2016). Cheating and loss aversion: do people cheat more to avoid a loss? Management Science, 62(12), 3428-3438. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2313
Hajhoseiny, S., Fathi, Z., & Shafiei, H. (2019). Are those with darker personality traits more willing to corrupt when they feel Anxious? Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 451-479. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijms.2019.266704.673335
Hanf, M., Van-Melle, A., Fraisse, F., Roger, A., Carme, B., & Nacher, M. (2011). Corruption kills: estimating the global impact of corruption on children deaths. PLoS One, 6(11), e26990. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026990
Harrison, A., Summers, J., & Mennecke, B. (2018). The effects of the dark triad on unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(1), 53-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3368-3
Jha, C., & Panda, B. (2017). Individualism and corruption: A cross-country analysis. Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 36(1), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12163
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
Jones, D. N. (2013). What’s mine is mine and what’s yours is mine: The Dark Triad and gambling with your neighbor’s money. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 563-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.04.005
Kusuma Putri, W. W., Probowati, Y., & Arunima, A. (2021). Dark Triad personality as predictor of corrupt intention on the state civil apparatus. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 10(2), 375. https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v10i2.20649
Maciel, G. G, Magalhães, P. C., de Sousa, L., Pinto, I. R., & Clemente, F. (2022). A Scoping review on perception-based definitions and measurements of corruption. Public Integrity, 26(1), 114-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2115235
Manee, F. M., Salehi, M., & Khouie, S. A. (2020). The Dark Triad of personality in convicts and non-convicts: narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Clinical Psychology & Personality, 15(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.22070/cpap.2017.15.1.113
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681-712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696
Miura, M. A., Pilati, R., Milfont, T. L., Ferreira, M. C., & Fischer, R. (2019). Between simpatia and malandragem: Brazilian jeitinho as an individual difference variable. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0214929. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214929
Modesto, J. G., & Pilati, R. (2020). “Why are the corrupt, corrupt?”: The Multilevel Analytical Model of Corruption. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 23, e5. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2020.5
Modesto, J. G., & Pilati, R. (2023). The impact of loss aversion on corruption. Trends in Psychology, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-023-00300-z
Modesto, J. G., Keller, V. N., Saraiva, R. B., & Pilati, R. (2020). Belief in a corrupt world: A cross-cultural mediation model of beliefs about justice, punishment, and corruption. Personality and Individual Differences, 164, 110127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110127
Modesto, J. G., Pereira, K., & Carvalho, R. (2021). Associação entre os cinco grandes fatores da personalidade e a intenção de corrupção. Actualidades en Psicología, 35(131), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.15517/ap.v35i131.41818
Monteiro, R. P. (2017). Tríade sombria da personalidade: Conceitos, medição e correlatos [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Federal da Paraíba]. https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/bitstream/123456789/12165/1/Arquivototal.pdf
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
Pettigrew, T. F. (2018). The emergence of Contextual Social Psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(7), 963-971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218756033
Ponce-Díaz, C. R., Aiquipa-Tello, J. J., Pacheco-Luza, E. F., & Pezúa-Vasquez, R. L. (2024). Tests assessing corrupt behavior from a psychological perspective: a systematic review. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000833
Schindler, S., & Pfattheicher, S. (2017). The frame of the game: loss-framing increases dishonest behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 172-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.009
Soares, S. T. A., & Modesto, J. G. (2022). Persuasion and emotions: consumer fraud on Black Friday Brazil. Ciencias Psicológicas, 16(2). e-2339. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v16i2.2339
Soeharto, I., & Nugroho, N. (2018). Are we culturally corrupt? Revisiting the relationship between cultural dimensions and Corruption Perception Index. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 2(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfj.001.17.02.02.02
Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: causes, consequences, scope, and cures. IMF Economic Review, 45(4), 559-594. https://doi.org/10.2307/3867585
Transparency International. (2022). Índice de Percepção de Corrupção 2021. https://transparenciainternacional.org.br/ipc/?utm_source=Redes+Socias&utm_medium=Twitter&utm_campaign=Lancamento
Triberti, S., Durosini, I., & Pravettoni, G. (2021). Social distancing is the right thing to do: Dark Triad behavioral correlates in the COVID-19 quarantine. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110453
van Gelder, J. L. (2013). Beyond rational choice: The hot/cool perspective of criminal decision making. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(9), 745-763. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.660153
Vilanova, F., Milfont, T. L., & Costa, A. B. (2022). A dual process social psychological model of corrupt intention and attitudes toward corrupt people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(4), 854-883. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000414
Vize, C. E., Collison, K. L., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2020). The “core” of the dark triad: A test of competing hypotheses. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000386
Zhao, H., Zhang, H., & Xu, Y. (2016). Does the Dark Triad of personality predict corrupt intention? The mediating role of Belief in Good Luck. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00608
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Ciencias Psicológicas
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.