Restrictions on the headscarf: state neutrality and human rights.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v0i2.845Keywords:
human rights, religious freedom, multiculturalism, tolerance, islamism, lay stateAbstract
Abstract. In the last years the Islamic veil has been the object of intense debate, especially in some European countries. Religious neutrality or the lay State, religious freedom in its positive and negative facets and the principle of tolerance, among others are tightly interwoven in this debate. Within that context, on the basis of national court rulings and decisions of international human rights organizations, this work attempts to reflect the main legal aspects related to the restrictions imposed on the use of the Islamic veil in public educational institutions. Furthermore, this paper draws the fundamental guidelines for a critical examination of the topic from the human rights perspective, particularly religious freedom and the principle of tolerance.
Downloads
References
ANGER, Thorsten, Islam in der Schule, Duncker & Humblot, Berlín, 2003.
BAER, Susanne, y Michael WRASE, “Staatliche Neutralität und Toleranz: Das Kopftuch-Urteil des BVerfG”, en JuS, 2003, pp. 1162-1166.
— “Staatliche Neutralität und Toleranz in der ‘christlich-abendländischen Wertenwelt’: zur aktuellen Entwicklung im Streit um das islamische Kopftuch”, en DOV, n.o 58, 2005, pp. 243-252.
BOBBIO, Norberto, L’età dei diritti, Einaudi, Turín, 1997, pp. 240 y 243.
LE TOURNEAU, Dominique, “El ‘velo islámico’ y la neutralidad de la escuela pública en Francia”, en Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, n.o 89, 1997, pp. 623-632.
LINDNER, Josef, Theorie der Grundrechtsdogmatik, Mohr Siebeck, Tubinga, 2005, pp. 268 ss.
MCGOLDRICK, Dominic, Human Rights and Religion: The Islamic Headscarf Debate in Europe, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2006.
TOULEMONDE, Bernard, “Le porte de signes d’appartenance religieuse à l’école: la fin des interrogations?”, en AJDA, 37, 2005, pp. 2044-2048.
ZACHARIAS, Diana, “Das Kopftuch vor internationalen Gerichten”, en Kirche und Recht, 2006, pp. 189-199.