Rhetoric of legal discourse.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v0i7.790Keywords:
rhetoric, legal discourse, linguistics, argumentAbstract
Abstract. Is constructed as a definition of legal rhetoric to the actions of legal language about language.From this premise explores the relationships and boundaries that exist between legal discourse understood as legal proficiency and the enunciation of speech,
the speaker’s point of view of legal and effective legal proceedings before the audience.
Downloads
References
Aristóteles, Retórica, Madrid: Gredos, 1990.
Austin, John L., Cómo hacer cosas con las palabras, Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica, 1996.
Bajtin, M. M., Estética de la creación verbal, México: Siglo XXI, 1982.
Benveniste, Emile, Problemas de lingüística general, México: Siglo XXI, 1995.
Cicerón, Marco Tulio, De la invención retórica, México: UNAM, 1997.
— De la partición oratoria, México: UNAM, 2000.
Ducrot, Oswald, El decir y lo dicho. Polifonía de la enunciación, Barcelona: Paidós, 1986.
Foucault, Michel, Entre filosofía y literatura, Barcelona: Paidós, 1999.
Greimas, A. J., Semántica estructural. Investigación metodológica, Madrid: Gredos, 1987.
Platón, Diálogos, México: Porrúa, 2012.
Quintiliano, Marco Fabio, Institución oratoria, México: Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes, 1999.
Searle, John. Actos de habla, Barcelona: Planeta-Agostini, 1994.
Van Dijk, Teun A., La ciencia del texto, Barcelona: Paidós, 1999.
— Ideología. Una aproximación multidisciplinaria, Barcelona: Gedisa, 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This publication is attached to the Creative Commons policy.
Political: this magazine provides an access open immediate to its content, based on the principle of that offer to the public an access free to them research helps to a higher Exchange global of knowledge.
Edition covered Dec. 218 / 96. Committee on the role. The reproduction total or partial in form identical or modified written to machine, by the system multigraph, mimeograph, printed, photocopy, scanner, media electronic, etc. not authorized by them editors violates rights reserved. Any use must be requested previously. Them opinions poured by the authors in their articles not reflect necessarily the seem of the Faculty of psychology of the University Catholic of the Uruguay.