Tension between right to privacy and right to freedom of information.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v0i11.728Keywords:
privacy, freedom of information, public information - actual maliceAbstract
Abstract:The article develops elements linked to civil liability arising from the tension between the right to privacy and the right to freedom of information, since the consideration of the jurisprudence developed in Argentina from public knowledge that “Noticias” magazine made about the existence of President Carlos Menem’s illegitimate son. Issues related to the limits and prevalence of both rights as well as their violations that might arise by the public knowledge of this information because of its public importance, which is also considered and analyzed.
Finally, the doctrine of actual malice is discussed in its different components to advance as conclusions about the tension developed at the beginning.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This publication is attached to the Creative Commons policy.
Political: this magazine provides an access open immediate to its content, based on the principle of that offer to the public an access free to them research helps to a higher Exchange global of knowledge.
Edition covered Dec. 218 / 96. Committee on the role. The reproduction total or partial in form identical or modified written to machine, by the system multigraph, mimeograph, printed, photocopy, scanner, media electronic, etc. not authorized by them editors violates rights reserved. Any use must be requested previously. Them opinions poured by the authors in their articles not reflect necessarily the seem of the Faculty of psychology of the University Catholic of the Uruguay.
