Function and limits of legal argumentation

Authors

  • Ricardo Guibourg Universidad de Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v0i19.1730

Keywords:

argument, law, demostration, weighing

Abstract

Argumentation is the most important, if not the only, weapon for lawyers, judges and legal experts to do their job, but nowadays it seems excessively trusted. It has the structure of an incomplete demonstration, where, starting from premises (arguments, reasons), a descriptive or an evaluative consequence is proposed, though we can keep on the discussion indefinitely. Such discussion can be exercised by showing internal inconsistencies, by denying factual descriptions, by signalling an incompatibility among its evaluative arguments and other evaluations sustained by the same subject; by proposing new opposed arguments or emphasizing that the invoked reasons are not conclusive enough. But there is an extended idea that we can arrive to unquestionable conclusions: a basic idea within the present discourse about principles and rights. This discourse cannot function without a weighing method, but such method does not exist, in spite of an extended belief. That situation is dangerous to the legal discourse: instead, argumentation may be an instrument for discussions, agreements and decisions through institutional means. This can be done, to great advantage for law; but it hurts against hard ideological obstacles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexy, Robert, Teoría de la argumentación jurídica, Lima, Palestra, 2006.

Atienza, Manuel, Las razones del derecho. Teorías de la argumentación jurídica, México, UNAM, 2005.

Guibourg, Ricardo A “Alexy y su fórmula del peso”, en Gustavo A. Beade y Laura Clérico (eds.), Desafíos a la ponderación, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá, 2011, págs. 157/187. Versión en inglés: “On Alexy’s Weighing Formula”, en ARSP n. 124, Legal reasoning: the methods of balancing, 2010, pp 145-159.

Guibourg, Ricardo A., El fenómeno normativo, Buenos Aires, Astrea, 1987.

Pensar en las normas, Eudeba, Buenos Aires, 1999.

Guibourg, Ricardo A La construcción del pensamiento, Colihue, Buenos Aires, 2004.

Guibourg, Ricardo A “Sobre la argumentación”, en La Ley del 30/9/2010.

Perelman, Chaim y Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie, Tratado de la argumentación: la nueva retórica, Madrid, Gredos, 2009.

Toulmin, Stephen, The uses of argumentation, Cambridge University Press, 1958.

Published

2018-11-23

How to Cite

Guibourg, R. (2018). Function and limits of legal argumentation. Revista De Derecho, (19), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v0i19.1730

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.