Philosophical arguments in Uruguayan jurisprudence

Authors

  • Martín Guerra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v18i2.1720

Keywords:

argumentation, philosophi of law, philosophy of law, uruguayan jurisprudence

Abstract

The present constitutes the final external work for the course of philosophy of the law and consists, basically, in the analysis of the argumentation and juridical interpretation wielded by the integrated majority of the Court of Civil appeals of 6th shift in the Sentence N ° 37/1996. As well as the employee in the discord of one of its natural members.

No other element linked to the judgement that might be of interest in the particular case, such as the factual basis on which the pronouncement or appraisal of the test carried out by each minister, shall be subject to study. These elements will be given for assumptions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Audi, Robert. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Casalmiglia, Albert. "El concepto de integridad en Dworkin." Revista DOXA N.12, 1992: 155-176.

Cavino, Massimo. "Intención del legislador y significado de la Ley Ordinaria en la Jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional Italiana." Derechos y libertades: Revista del Instituto Bartolomé de las Casas Año 13° n° 21, 2009: 15-53.

Cicerón, Marco Tulio. De legibus. Edición bilingüe de Chantal López y Omar Cortés, s/f.

Dworkin, Ronald. El imperio de la justicia. Barcelona: Gedisa, 1986.

Dworkin, Ronald. Los derechos en serio. Barcelona: Ariel Derecho, 1977.

Hart, Herbert. El Concepto del Derecho. Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot, 1961.

Kelsen, Hans. Teoría pura del Derecho. Ciudad Universitaria: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1934.

Mendonca, Daniel. Las claves del Derecho. Barecelona: Gedisa, 2000.

Miranda Alonso, Tomás. El juego de la argumentación. Madrid: Ediciones de la Torre, 1995.

Ross, Alf. Sobre el derecho y la justicia. 3a. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA, 1958.

Vigo, Rodolfo Luis. "Iusnaturalismo vs. Iuspositivismo (un alegato Iusnaturalista)." Prudentia Iuris N° 62-63 (Universidad Catolica Argentina), 2007: 43-102.

Zagrebelsky, Gustavo. El derecho ductil. Ley, derechos, justicia. Madrid: Editorial Trotta, 1995.

Zagrebelsky, Gustavo. Il sistema delle fonti del diritto. Torino: UTET, 1988.

Published

2018-11-12

How to Cite

Guerra, M. (2018). Philosophical arguments in Uruguayan jurisprudence. Revista De Derecho, (18), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v18i2.1720

Issue

Section

Essay and research

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.