EL LUGAR SOCIAL DEL CONOCIMIENTO ENFERMERO: LOS EDITORIALES CIENTÍFICOS COMO ARTEFACTOS LINGÜÍSTICOS DESDE LA PERSPECTIVA DE MICHEL DE CERTEAU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/ech.v8i2.1844Palavras-chave:
Enfermagem, Conhecimento, Produção, Revistas Cientificas, Michel de CertauResumo
El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar el proceso de producción del conocimiento enfermero. Este propósito se ha acometido desde una perspectiva filosófica, basada en el concepto de lugar social desarrollado por Michel de Certeau. El lugar social incluye la dimensión institucional, los procedimientos utilizados para generar conocimiento y los valores que lo sostienen. Para aplicar este marco epistemológico a la enfermería, los autores se han centrado en el estudio del Journal of Nursing Scholarship (JNS), a través de un análisis textual en el que se han estudiado los editoriales escritos por Susan Gennaro en JNS desde 2007 hasta mayo de 2018, aplicandoles las categorías epistemológicas certeaunianas. Después de una lectura atenta es posible afirmar que JNS puede ser visto como una institución del conocimiento, que mantiene una estrecha relación con el poder, establece acuerdos con autores y revisores, y que escribe su propio discurso sobre la realidad. También han sido identificados los procedimientos clave que marcan cómo ha de ser escrito un artículo para JNS. Finalmente, la práctica, la significación social, la eficiencia, la universalidad, la buena ciencia y el liderazgo han aparecido como los principales valores de JNS. Las aportaciones de este trabajo pueden ayudar a los enfermeros a comprender que ningún conocimiento (ni los artefactos lingüísticos asociados al mismo) está completamente libre de influencias sociales.
Downloads
Referências
Gonzalez‐Sanz, JD, Noreña‐Pena, A, Amezcua, M. New ways for nursing inspired by the works of Michel de Certeau. Nursing Philosophy 2018; 19:e12183. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12183
Certeau M. de. The Writing of History. New York: USA: Columbia University Press; 1992.
Buchanan I. Guest editor´s introduction. Social Semiotics 1996, 6(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350339609384459
Certeau M. de. Culture in the Plural. Minneapolis: USA: University of Minnesota Press; 1997.
D´Antonio P. Toward a History of Research in Nursing. Nursing Research 1997, 46(2):105-110. https://journals.lww.com/nursingresearchonline/Fulltext/1997/03000/Toward_a_History_of_Research_in_Nursing.8.aspx
Certeau M. de. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: USA: University of California Press; 1988.
Caronia L. & Mortari L. The agency of things: how spaces and artefacts organize the moral order of an intensive care unit. Social Semiotics 2015, 25(4): 401-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1059576
Gennaro S. Searching for knowledge. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2009, 41(1): 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01243_1.x
Gennaro S. Advancing knowledge that improves world health. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2007, 39(4): 289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00182.x
Gennaro S. Enjoying the Benefits. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2016, 48(6): 531-532. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12255
Gennaro S. Viewing and reviewing. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2008, 40(4): 299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00257.x
Gennaro S. Hello. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2007, 39(3): 207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00169.x
Gennaro S. Print or Online Publishing: Changing Technology. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2016, 48(1): 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12188
Gennaro S. Why write? Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2016, 48(2): 117. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12200
Gennaro S. How Can We Disseminate Nursing Science More Effectively? Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2018, 50(2): 111-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12372
Gennaro S. Peer Review: We Can’t Do Without You. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2015, 47(6): 485-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12172
Strauss L. On tiranny. New York: USA: Free Press; 1991.
Gennaro S. Why Do I Do Research? Why Should You Do Research? Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2017, 49(4): 359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12306
Gennaro S. Building a Research Trajectory. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2015, 47(4): 285-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12145
Chyun D & Henly S. New scholars writing for publication. Nursing Research 2015, 64(4): 231-234. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.000000000000010
Gennaro S. Where Should You Share? Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2015, 47(1): 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12119
Gennaro S. Impact and scholarship. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2010, 42(3): 233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01361.x
Gennaro S. Scientists and Social Media. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2015, 47(5): 377-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12161
Certeau M. de, Julia D & Revel J. Une politique de la langue. Paris: France: Gallimard; 2002.
Carter M. Deceit and dishonesty as practice: the comfort of lying. Nursing Philosophy 2016, 17: 202-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nup.12129
Amezcua M & Reina Leal LM. La defensa del conocimiento como causa social. Index de Enfermería 2013, 22(1-2): 111-114. http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-12962013000100025
Gennaro S. What you want to know. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2011, 43(4): 329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01423.x
Gennaro S. From Where I Sit. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2017, 49(5): 469. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12325
Gennaro S. Publishing Success: Rules to Live By. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2018, 50: 239-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12382
Gennaro S. Five tips on getting research published. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2012, 44(3): 203-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01461.x
Gennaro S. Mistakes to Avoid in Scientific Writing. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2016, 48(5): 435-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12235
Gennaro S. Writing: Ensuring the Stars Align. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2014, 46(4): 217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12098
Gennaro S. If you can differentiate your apostrophe from your elbow, should you? Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2011, 43(2): 105-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01396.x
Gennaro S. Sing of significance. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2008, 40(2): 99-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00212.x
Gennaro S. Worth more or worth less? Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2008, 40(3): 203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00227.x
Gennaro S. Closing the gap. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2010, 42(4): 357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01372.x
Gennaro S. Wanted: less time and more space! Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2009, 41(4): 329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01299_1.x
Broome M, Dougherty MC, Freda MC, Kearney MH & Baggs JG. Ethical concerns of nursing reviewers: An international survey. Nursing Ethics 2010, 17(6): 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733010379177
Gennaro S. The author’s authentic voice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2011, 43(3): 221–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01411.x
Thompson JL. Practical discourse in nursing - going beyond empiricism and historicism. Advances in Nursing Science 1985, 7(4): 59-71. https://journals.lww.com/advancesinnursingscience/Abstract/1985/07000/Practical_discourse_in_nursing__going_beyond.9.aspx
Gennaro S. What Do You Need to Read? Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2014, 46(5): 303. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12100
Gennaro S. Are We There Yet? Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2014, 46(6): 389-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12111
Gennaro S. Celebrating 40 years of disseminating knowledge that improves global health. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2008, 40(1): 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00197.x
Gennaro S. Nursing science: cutting edge research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2012, 44(4): 311-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01478.x
Rolfe G. Foundations for a human science of nursing: Gadamer, Laing and the hermeneutics of caring. Nursing Philosophy 2014, 16(3): 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12075
Rolfe G. A sacred command of reason? Deceit, deception, and dishonesty in nurse education. Nursing Philosophy 2016, 17(3): 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12124
Gennaro S. What the world needs now. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2009, 41(2): 113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01260.x
Gennaro S. Scanning the Horizon. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2016, 48(4): 333. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12225
Gennaro S. Conducting Important and Ethical Research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2014, 46(2): 73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12069
Thompson DR & Watson R. Continuing professorial development. Nurse Education in Practice 2010, 10: 319-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.02.004
Gennaro S. The Future of Nursing: accomplishments a year after the landmark report. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2012, 44(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01433.x
Gennaro S. On Mattering—A tribute to Donna Diers. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2013, 45(2): 105-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12034
Gennaro S. Looking backward and looking forward. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2010, 42(1): 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01332.x
Gennaro S. Brevity and Clarity: Titles, Key Words, and Search Engine Optimization. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2015, 47(3): 195-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12129
Gennaro S. Ideas and words: the ethics of scholarship. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2012, 44(2): 109-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01450.x
Gennaro S. Duplicate Publication. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2017, 49(2): 125-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12282
Eriksson S & Helgesson G. The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2016, 20: 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3
Gennaro S. Evolving Methodologies and Technologies in Nursing Science. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2016, 48(3): 221-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12212
Gennaro S. Your legacy. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2013, 45(4): 327. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12054
Watson R & Thompson DR. Recent developments in UK nurse education: Horses for courses or courses for horses? Journal of Advanced Nursing 2000, 32(5): 1041-1043. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.1147a.x
Thompson DR & Watson R. Academic nursing- what is happening to it and where is it going? Journal of Advanced Nursing 2001, 36(1): 1-2. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01999.x
Thompson DR & Watson R. Professors of nursing: What do they profess? Nurse Education in Practice 2006, 6: 123-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2006.03.001
Thompson DR & Watson R. Response to Rolfe, G. 2007. Nursing scholarship and the asymmetrical professor. Asymmetrical professors- Unbalanced or misunderstood? Nurse Education in Practice 2008, 8: 73-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2007.07.006
Thompson DR & Watson R. Professors as leaders. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2008, 17(8): 981-982. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02248.x
Thompson DR & Watson R. How to be a professor: What Taylor et al. didn’t tell you! Nurse Education Today 2010, 30: 489-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.11.009
Thompson DR & Watson R. Continuing professorial development. Nurse Education in Practice 2010, 10: 319-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.02.004
Rolfe G. Nursing scholarship and the asymmetrical professor. Nurse Education in Practice 2007, 7: 123-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2006.12.002
Rolfe G. Writing-up and writing-as: Rediscovering nursing scholarship. Nurse Education Today 2009, 29: 816-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.05.015
Taylor J, Hallstron I, Begley C & Salanterä S. How to be a professor: What the books don’t tell you! Nurse Education Today 2009, 29 (7): 691-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.06.007
Planella J & Bara FE. Aspectos que valdría la pena recuperar para la educación universitaria de hoy. CADMO 2018, 1: 25-36. 10.3280/CAD2018-001004
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Enfermería: Cuidados Humanizados
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.