Adaptation and validation of the Psychologist and Counsellor Self-Efficacy Scale (PCES) among Brazilian psychologists and psychology students

Suzanna Araújo Preuhs; Gabriel Teixeira Da Silva; Andressa Melina Becker Da Silva; Fernanda Machado Lopes; André Luiz  Monezi Andrade

doi:10.22235/cp.v17i2.2881

Autores/as

Suzanna Araújo Preuhs Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5490-0157
Gabriel Teixeira Da Silva Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1076-1324
Andressa Melina Becker Da Silva Universidade de Sorocaba https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5630-7843
Fernanda Machado Lopes Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4853-7670
André Luiz Monezi Andrade Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0111-8935

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v17i2.2881

Palabras clave:

autoeficacia, propiedades psicométricas, evaluación psicológica, validez, invariancia

Resumen

Este estudio tuvo como objetivo: (i) traducir, adaptar y evaluar las propiedades lingüísticas y semánticas del Psychologist and Counsellor Self-Efficacy Scale (PCES) para su uso en estudiantes de psicología y psicólogos en Brasil; (ii) evaluar los atributos psicométricos del PCES adaptado, incluyendo su validez de constructo y otras propiedades psicométricas relacionadas. Un total de 2139 participantes, que incluyen psicólogos y estudiantes de psicología (M_edad = 25.36 años; DE = 9.46), participaron del estudio. El PCES exhibió índices de ajuste encomiables (CFI = .990; TLI = .989; SMR = .043) y el análisis factorial confirmatorio multigrupo reveló un nivel consistente de invarianza para estudiantes y psicólogos en ejercicio, así como entre participantes masculinos y femeninos. El análisis de red ofreció importantes perspicacias sobre la distribución de factores, mientras que la validez convergente del PCES fue corroborada por sus correlaciones con las subescalas de la Escala General de Autoeficacia Percibida (EGAP). Estos hallazgos afirman de manera inequívoca la confiabilidad y adecuación del PCES como instrumento de evaluación tanto para psicólogos como para estudiantes de psicología en el contexto brasileño.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Andrade, A. L. M., Kim, D. J., Scatena, A., Enes, C. C., Enumo, S. R. F., & De Micheli, D. (2020). Validity and Reliability of the Brazilian Version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Long Version (SAS-LV). Trends in Psychology, 29, 302-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-020-00046-y

Andrade, A. L. M., Scatena, A., Bedendo, A., Machado, W. D. L., Oliveira, W. A. D., Lopes, F. M., & Micheli, D. D. (2023a). Excessive Internet and smartphone use and emotional problems in students of psychology and psychologists. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 40, e210010 https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202340e210010en

Andrade, A. L. M., Spritzer, D. T., Scatena, A., de Oliveira Pinheiro, B., da Silva, G. T., Kim, H. S., & De Micheli, D. (2023b). Psychometric properties of the Smartphone Addiction Inventory-Short Form (SPAI-SF) in Brazilian adolescents. Psychiatry Research, 319, 115001.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2022.115001

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15326985ep2802_3

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Worth Publishers.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bandura, A. (2010). Self-Efficacy. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology.

Brazil. (2019). Revisão das Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais (DCNs) dos Cursos de Graduação em Psicologia e estabelecimento de normas para o Projeto Pedagógico Complementar (PPC) para a Formação de Professores de Psicologia. https://acortar.link/4nx52u

Chenneville, T., & Schwartz-Mette, R. (2020). Ethical considerations for psychologists in the time of COVID-19. American Psychologist, 75(5), 644-654. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000661

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Conselho Regional de Psicologia de São Paulo. (2004). Seção Aberta. Pesquisa revela o perfil completo do profissional no país. Jornal PSI, 141. http://www.crpsp.org.br/portal/comunicacao/jornal_crp/141/frames/fr_secao_aberta.aspx

Consiglio, C., Borgogni, L., Tecco, C., & Schaufeli, W. (2016). What makes employees engaged with their work? The role of self-efficacy and employee's perceptions of social context over time. Career Development International, 21(2), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-03-2015-0045

De Almeida Lins, C., do Amaral, J. D. H. F., da Silva, A. M. B., & Andrade, A. L. M. (2022). Psychometric evidence of the online version of the Coping Scale of Hospitalization, Illness and Treatment− Parents Version (COPHAT-P). Revista Psicologia e Saúde, 21-37. https://doi.org/10.20435/pssa.v14i2.1700

De Oliveira Pinheiro, B., Monezi Andrade, A. L., Lopes, F. M., Reichert, R. A., de Oliveira, W. A., da Silva, A. M. B., & De Micheli, D. (2022). Association between quality of life and risk behaviors in Brazilian adolescents: An exploratory study. Journal of Health Psychology, 27(2), 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320953472

Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Borsboom, D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i04

Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 17(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.7275/N560-J767

Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology Education, 28(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2020). Uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/-livros/liv98965.pdf

International Test Commission. (2005). International Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet Delivered Testing. https://www.intestcom.org/files/-guideline_computer_based_testing.pdf

Irwin, A. M., Oberhelman, N. A., & Davies, S. C. (2020). Study Abroad and School Psychologists' Perceptions of Intercultural Competence. Contemporary School Psychology, 25, 367-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00337-2

Kaas, F. M. (2018). An examination of the relationship between supervision and self-efficacy in early career school psychologists, school psychology interns, and practicum students [Doctoral dissertation]. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Kline, P. (2015). A handbook of test construction (psychology revivals): introduction to psychometric design. Routledge.

Koehler, S. E., & Mata, L. (2021). Analisando a autoeficácia e o engajamento no trabalho de psicólogos escolares. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 21(2), 1367-1374. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/rpot/2021.2.21236

Larson, K. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2017). Cultural competence and social desirability among practitioners: A systematic review of the literature. Children and Youth Services Review, 76, 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.02.034

Latorre, C., Leppma, M., Platt, L. F., Shook, N., & Daniels, J. (2021). The relationship between mindfulness and self-compassion for self-assessed competency and self-efficacy of psychologists-in-training. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 17(2), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000395

Li, H., Liu, J., Zhang, D. & Liu, H. (2021). Examining the relationships between cognitive activation, self‐efficacy, socioeconomic status, and achievement in mathematics: A multi‐level analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 101-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12351

Lisboa, F. S., & Barbosa, A. J. G. (2009). Formação em psicologia no Brasil: Um perfil dos cursos de graduação. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 29(4), 718-737. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1414- 98932009000400006

Lopes, F. M., Coelho, D. M. V., Andrade, A. L. M., da Silva, A. M. B., de Carvalho, C. F., & De Micheli, D. (2022). Differences in attitudes and perceptions between educators with or without knowledge in neuroscience. Trends in Psychology, 30(4), 729-744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-022-00169-4

Maddux, J. E., & Meier, L. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and depression. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: theory, research, and application (pp. 143-169). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_5

Milsom, A., & McCormick, K. (2015). Evaluating an accountability mentoring approach for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 19(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.5330/2156759x1501900102

Mollen, D., & Ridley, C. R. (2021). Rethinking multicultural counseling competence: An introduction to the major contribution. The Counseling Psychologist, 49(4), 490-503. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0011000020986543

Mullen, P. R., & Lambie, G. W. (2016). The contribution of school counselors' self-efficacy to their programmatic service delivery. Psychology in the Schools, 53(3), 306-320. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21899

Peixoto, E. M., & Ferreira-Rodrigues, C. F. (2019). Propriedades psicométricas dos testes psicológicos. In M. N. Baptista, M. Muniz, C. T. Reppold, C. H. S. da Silva Nunes, L. F. Carvalho, R. Primi, A. P. P. Noronha, A. G. Seabra, S. M. Wechsler, C. S. Huz & L. Pasquali. (Orgs.), Compêndio de avaliação psicológica (pp. 29-39). Vozes.

Rief, W. (2021). Moving from tradition-based to competence-based psychotherapy. Evidence-based mental health, 24(3), 115-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300219

Rodriguez, S. Y. S., Carlotto, M. S. & Câmara, S. G. (2017). Impacto da regulação de emoções no trabalho sobre as dimensões de Burnout em psicólogos: O papel moderador da autoeficácia. Análise Psicológica, 35(2), 191-201. https://dx.doi.org/10.14417/ap.1147

Sbicigo, J. B., Teixeira, M. A. P., Dias, A. C. G., & Dell'Aglio, D. D. (2012). Propriedades psicométricas da escala de autoeficácia geral percebida (EAGP). Psico, 43(2), 1-8.

Scholz, U., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Sud, S. & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.18.3.242

Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. Em J. Weinman, S. Wright & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio (pp. 35-37). Nfer-Nelson.

Spritzer, D. T., Andrade, A. L. M., Xavier, A. Z., da Silva, G. T., Kim, H. S., Kaliszewska-Czeremska, K., Laconi, S., Igarashi, T., Passos, I. C., & Hauck, S. (2022). The Self-perception of Text message Dependence Scale (STDS): A Brazilian-Portuguese validation and expansion of its psychometric properties. Current Psychology, 42(21), 17670-17681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02957-8

Tang, D., Fan, W., Zou, Y., George, R. A., Arbona, C., & Olvera, N. E. (2021). Self-efficacy and achievement emotions as mediators between learning climate and learning persistence in college calculus: A sequential mediation analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 92, 102094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102094

Tian, G., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., & Wen, Y. (2019). Self-efficacy and work performance: The role of work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 47(12), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8528

Vieira-Santos, J. (2016). Impacto das Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais na Formação em Psicologia: Revisão de Literatura. Psicologia Ensino & Formação, 7(2), 34-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.21826/2179-58002016723552

Watt, H. M. G., Ehrich, J., Stewart, S. E., Snell, T., Bucich, M., Jacobs, N., Furlonger, B., & English, D. (2019). Development of the Psychologist and Counsellor Self-Efficacy Scale. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 9(3), 485-509. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-07-2018-0069

Wen, F. F., Zhu, J. L., Ye, H. X., Li, L. Y., Ma, Z., Wen, X. X., & Zuo, B. (2021). Associations between insecurity and stress among Chinese university students: The mediating effects of hope and self-efficacy. Journal of Affective Disorders, 281(15), 447-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.047

Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x