The marital relationship from the perspective of couples
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v15i1.2355Keywords:
marital relations, marriage, marital quality, individuality, contextAbstract
Marital relationships have been widely investigated. However, there is little clarity about the definition, theoretical contextualization, and the comprehensiveness of the concept of marital quality. Thus, this study aimed to clarify the marital quality construct by proposing dimensions that elucidate an intersection of themes related to the individual, the context, and the adaptive processes, from the perspective of couples. Eight couples answered a semi-structured interview on their marital relationship, which was examined through a thematic analysis. Twenty-one themes were identified, divided into four thematic axes based on the model: individual, context, adaptive processes, and marital quality. Adaptive processes played a central role, as the relationships between the individual and the context axes with the marital quality axis permeate these processes. The importance of adaptive processes in couple interventions is emphasized and further investigation of the adopted model in Brazil is recommended.
Downloads
References
Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Love at first sight or friends first? Ties among partner personality trait similarity, relationship onset, relationship quality, and love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(4), 479-496. doi: 10.1177/0265407507079235
Baucom, B. R., Dickenson, J. A., Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., Fischer, M. S., Weusthoff, S., Hahlweg, K., & Zimmerman, T. (2015). The interpersonal process model of demand/withdraw behavior. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(1), 80-90. doi: 10.1037/fam0000044
Bohns, V. K., Lucas, G. M., Molden, D. C., Finkel, E. J., Coolsen, M. K., Kumashiro, M., Rusbult, C. E., & Higgins, E. T. (2013). Opposites fit: Regulatory focus complementarity and relationship well-being. Social Cognition, 31(1), 1-14. doi: 10.1521/soco.2013.31.1.1
Borges, C. C., Magalhães, A. S., & Féres-Carneiro, T. (2014). Liberdade e desejo de constituir família: Percepções de jovens adultos. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 66(3), 89-103.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Conselho Nacional de Saúde (2012). Resolução nº 466/2012 - Dispõe sobre pesquisa envolvendo seres humanos. Brasil: Ministério da Saúde, Brasília, DF.
Costa, C. B., & Mosmann, C. (2015). Relacionamentos conjugais na atualidade: Percepções de indivíduos em casamentos de longa duração. Revista da SPAGESP, 16(2), 16-31.
Coutinho, S. M. S., & Menandro, P. R. M. (2010). Relações conjugais e familiares na perspectiva de mulheres de duas gerações: “Que seja terno enquanto dure”. Psicologia Clínica, 22(2), 83-106. doi: 10.1590/S0103-56652010000200007
Curtis, K. T., & Ellison, C. G. (2002). Religious heterogamy and marital conflict. Journal of Family Issues, 23(4), 551-576. doi: 10.1177/0192513x02023004005
Delatorre, M. Z., & Wagner, A. (2020). Marital quality: reviewing the concept, instruments, and methods. Marriage & Family Review, 56(3), 293-216. doi: 10.1080/01494929.2020.1712300
Féres-Carneiro, T. (1987). Aliança e sexualidade no casamento e no recasamento contemporâneo. Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa, 3(3), 250–261.
Féres-Carneiro, T. (1997). Escolha amorosa e relação conjugal na homossexualidade e na heterossexualidade: um estudo sobre namoro, casamento, separação e recasamento. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 10(2), 351-368. doi: 10.1590/S0102-79721997000200012
Féres-Carneiro, T. (1998). Casamento contemporâneo: O difícil convívio da individualidade com a conjugalidade. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 11(2), 379-394. doi: 10.1590/S0102-79721998000200014
Féres-Carneiro, T., & Diniz-Neto, O. (2010). Construção e dissolução da conjugalidade: Padrões relacionais. Paidéia, 20, 269-278. doi: 10.1590/S0103-863X2010000200014
Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1987). The assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(4), 787-809. doi: 10.2307/351973
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340-354. doi: 10.1177/0146167200265007
Fowers, B. J., & Owenz, M. B. (2010). A Eudaimonic theory of marital quality. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 334-352. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00065.x
Gana, K., Saada, Y., Broc, G., Koleck, M., & Cazauvieilh, C. (2016). Dyadic cross-sectional associations between negative mood, marital idealization, and relationship quality. The Journal of Psychology, 150(7), 897-915, doi: 10.1080/00223980.2016.1211982
Gottman, J. M., Driver, J., & Tabares, A. (2015). Repair during marital conflict in newlyweds: How couples move from attack-defend to collaboration. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 26(2), 85-108. doi: 10.1080/08975353.2015.1038962
Halford, W. K., Markman, H. J., Kline, G. H., & Stanley, S. M. (2003). Best practice in couple relationship education. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29(3).385-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01214.x
Hardy, N. R., Soloski, K. L., Ratcliffe, G. C., Anderson, J. R., & Willoughby, B. J. (2015). Associations between family of origin climate, relationship self-regulation, and marital outcomes. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(4), 508-521. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12090
Heckler, V. I., & Mosmann, C. P. (2016). A qualidade conjugal nos anos iniciais do casamento em casais de dupla carreira. Psicologia Clínica, 28(1), 161-182.
Helms, H. M., Supple, A. J., Su, J., Rodriguez, Y., Cavanaugh, A. M., & Hengstebeck, N. D. (2014). Economic pressure, cultural adaptation stress, and marital quality among Mexican-Origin couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(1), 77-87. doi: 10.1037/a0035738
Heyman, R. E., Sayers, S. L., & Bellack, A. S. (1994). Global marital satisfaction versus marital adjustment: An empirical comparison of three measures. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(4), 432-446. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.8.4.432
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3- 34. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
Knapp, S. J., & Lott, B. (2010). Forming the central framework for a science of marital quality: An interpretive alternative to marital satisfaction as a proxy for marital quality. Journal of Family & Theory Review, 2, 316-333. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00064.x
Kwan, R. W. H., Kwok, S. Y. C. L., & Ling, C. C. Y. (2015). The moderating roles of parent self-efficacy and co-parenting alliance on marital satisfaction among Chinese fathers and mothers. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(12), 3506-3515. doi: 10.1007/s10826-015-0152-4
Ledermann, T., Bodenmann, G., Rudaz, M., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Stress, communication, and marital quality in couples. Family Relations, 59, 195-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00595.x
Lomando, E., Wagner, A., & Gonçalves, J. (2011). Coesão, adaptabilidade e rede social no relacionamento conjugal homossexual. Psicologia: Teoria e Prática, 13(3), 95-109.
Mahoney, A. (2005). Religion and conflict in marital and parent-child relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 689-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00427.x
Maisel, N. C., & Karney, B. R. (2012). Socioeconomic status moderates associations among stressful events, mental health, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(4), 654-660. doi: 10.1037/a0028901
McGoldrick, M., & Shibusawa, T. (2016). O ciclo vital familiar. In F. Walsh (Org.), Processos normativos da família: Diversidade e complexidade (pp. 375-398). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Meletti, A. T., & Scorsolini-Comin, F. (2015). Conjugalidade e expectativas em relação à parentalidade em casais homossexuais. Psicologia: Teoria e Prática, 17(1), 37-49. doi: 10.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v17n1p37-49
Mônego, B. G., & Teodoro, M. L. M. (2011). A teoria triangular do amor de Sternberg e o modelo dos cinco grandes fatores. Psico-USF, 16(1), 97-105. doi: 10.1590/S1413-82712011000100011
Mosmann, C., & Falcke, D. (2011). Conflitos conjugais: Motivos e frequência. Revista da SPAGESP, 12(2), 5-16.
Mosmann, C., Wagner, A., & Feres-Carneiro, T. (2006). Qualidade conjugal: Mapeando conceitos. Paidéia, 16(35), 315-325. doi: 10.1590/S0103-863X2006000300003
Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45,141-151. doi: 10.2307/351302
Rizzon, A. L. C., Mosmann, C. P., & Wagner, A. (2013). A qualidade conjugal e os elementos do amor: Um estudo correlacional. Contextos Clínicos, 6(1), 41-49. doi: 10.4013/ctc.2013.61.05
Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140-187. doi: 10.1037/a0031859
Rosado, J. S., & Wagner, A. (2015). Qualidade, ajustamento e satisfação conjugal: Revisão sistemática da literatura. Pensando Famílias, 19(2), 21-33.
Scheeren, P., Vieira, R. V. A., Goulart, V. R., & Wagner, A. (2014). Marital quality and attachment: The mediator role of conflict resolution styles. Paidéia, 24(58), 177-186. doi: 10.1590/1982-43272458201405
Scorsolini-Comin, F., & Santos, M. A. (2010). Satisfação conjugal: Revisão integrativa da literatura científica nacional. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 26(3), 525-532. doi: 10.1590/S0102-37722010000300015
Shiota, M. N., & Levenson, R. W. (2007). Birds of a feather don’t always fly farthest: Similarity in big five personality predicts more negative marital satisfaction trajectories in long-term marriages. Psychology and Aging, 22(4), 666-675. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.666
Silva, I. S., & Frizzo, G. B. (2014). Ter ou não ter? Uma revisão da literatura sobre casais sem filhos por opção. Pensando Famílias, 18(2), 48-61.
Silva, P. O. M., Trindade, Z. A., & Silva Junior, A. (2012). As representações sociais de conjugalidade entre casais recasados. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 17(3), 435-443. doi: 10.1590/S1413-294X2012000300012
Spanier, G. B., & Cole, C. L. (1976). Toward clarification and investigation of marital adjustment. Journal of Sociology of the Family, 6, 121-146.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119
Stroud, C. B., Meyers, K. M., Wilson, S., & Durbin, C. E. (2015). Marital quality spillover and young children’s adjustment: Evidence for dyadic and triadic parenting as mechanisms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(5), 800-813. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.900720
Unger, D., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Kuonath, A. (2015). The longer your work hours, the worse your relationship? The role of selective optimization with compensation in the associations of working time with relationship satisfaction and self-disclosure in dual-career couples. Human Relations, 68(12), 1889-1912. doi: 10.1177/0018726715571188
Vater, A., & Schröder-Abé, M. (2015). Explaining the link between personality and relationship satisfaction: Emotion regulation and interpersonal behaviour in conflict discussions. European Journal of Personality, 29, 201-215. doi: 10.1002/per.1993
Wagner, A., Mosmann, C. P., Scheeren, P., & Lvandowski, D. C. (2019). Conflict, conflict resolution and marital quality. Paidéia, 29(e2919). doi: 10.1590/1982-4327e2919
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Universidad Católica del Uruguay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.