Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Síntomas Globales Online (ESGO)

Resumen

A partir del desarrollo de nuevas tecnologías en el campo de la psicoterapia surge la necesidad de contar con pruebas válidas y confiables que permitan indagar la presencia de sintomatología desde el formato on-line. El objetivo del trabajo fue desarrollar una escala que permita evaluar sintomatología de ansiedad, depresión, relaciones interpersonales y psicoticismo. Participaron 550 adultos, quienes respondieron a un cuestionario on-line que incluía cuatro dimensiones (ansiedad, depresión, relaciones interpersonales, psicoticismo). Para analizar la validez externa se utilizó la prueba OQ-45 y SA-45. Se observó una consistencia interna y validez de constructo adecuadas para las cuatro dimensiones evaluadas. Asimismo, en su validez externa se hallaron relaciones significativas con el OQ-45 y SA-45. La prueba construida resulta adecuada para la evaluación de síntomas, siendo una herramienta válida para su uso psicoterapéutico. No obstante, es necesario continuar analizando sus propiedades psicométricas en pacientes con los diagnósticos indagados.

Citas

Baxter, A. J., Scott, K. M., Ferrari, A. J., Norman, R. E., Vos, T., & Whiteford, H. A. (2014). Challenging the myth of an “epidemic” of common mental disorders: trends in the global prevalence of anxiety and depression between 1990 and 2010. Depression and anxiety, 31(6), 506-516. doi: htpps://doi.org/10.1002/da.22230
Bentler, P. M. (2007). On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Personality and Individual differences, 42(5), 825-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.024
Blumenthal-Barby, J. S., & Krieger, H. (2015). Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Medical Decision Making, 35(4), 539-557. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14547740
Clough, B. A., & Casey, L. M. (2015). The smart therapist: A look to the future of smartphones and Health technologies in psychotherapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 46(3), 147. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pro0000011
Davison, M.K., Bershadsky, B., Bieber, J., Silversmith, D., Maruish, M.E., & Kane, R.L. (1997). Development of a brief, multidimensional, self- report instrument for treatment outcomes assessment in psychiatric settings: Preliminary findings. Assessment, 4, 259-276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119700400306
Derogatis, L. R., & Cleary, P. A. (1977). Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL‐90: a study in construct validation. Journal of clinical psychology, 33(4), 981-989. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(197710)33:4%3C981::AID-JCLP2270330412%3E3.0.CO;2-0
Doerfler, L. A., Addis, M. E., & Moran, P. W. (2002). Evaluating mental health outcomes in an inpatient setting: convergent and divergent validity of the OQ-45 and Basis-32. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 29(4), 394–403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287346
Feltham, C., Hanley, T., & Winter, L. A. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE handbook of counselling and psychotherapy. EE.UU.: Sage.
Fernández Álvarez, H, Gómez, B. & García, F. (2013) Bridging the gap between research and practice in a clinical and training network: Aigle´s Program. Psychotherapy Research, 25(4), 84-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.856047
Gelo, O. C. G., & Manzo, S. (2015). Quantitative approaches to treatment process, change process, and process-outcome research. En Psychotherapy Research (pp. 247-277). Springer Vienna. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1382-0_13
Gelo, O. C. G., & Salvatore, S. (2016). A dynamic systems approach to psychotherapy: A meta-theoretical framework for explaining psychotherapy change processes. Journal of counseling psychology, 63(4), 379. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cou0000150
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference 17.0 Update. 10th Edition. Pearson: Boston.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). SEM: An introduction. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective, 629-686.
Hardy, G. E., & Llewelyn, S. (2015). Introduction to psychotherapy process research. In Psychotherapy Research (pp. 183-194). Viena: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1382-0_9
Hyler, S. E., Gangure, D. P., & Batchelder, S. T. (2005). Can telepsychiatry replace in-person psychiatric assessments? A review and meta-analysis of comparison studies. CNS spectrums, 10(5), 403-415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S109285290002277X
Johnson, M. E., Chipp, C. L., Brems, C., & Neal, D. B. (2008). Receiver operating characteristics for the brief symptom inventory depression, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism scales in a large sample of clinical inpatients. Psychological Reports, 102(3), 695–705. doi: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.102.3.695-705
Kelley, S. & Bickman, L. (2009). Beyond outcomes monitoring: Measurement Feedback Systems (MFS) in child and adolescent clinical practice, Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22(4), 363–368. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832c9162
Kline, P. (2013). Handbook of psychological testing. USA: Routledge.
Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., Umphress, V., Lunnen, K., Okiishi, J., Burlingame, et al. (1996). Administration and scoring manual for the OQ-45.2. Stevenson, MD: American Professional Credentialing Services. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832c9162
Lambert, M. J. (2013). Outcome in Psychotherapy: The Past and Important Advances. Psychotherapy, 50(1), 42-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030682
Lara Muñoz, C., Espinosa de Santillana, I., Cárdenas, M. L., Fócil, M. & Cavazos, J. (2005). Confiabilidad y validez de la SCL-90 en la evaluación de psicopatología en mujeres. Salud Mental, 28(3), 42-50.
Lexcen, F. J., Hawk, J. L., Herrick, S., & Blank, M. B. (2006). Use of video conferencing for psychiatric and forensic evaluations. Psychiatric Services, 57, 713-715. doi: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.57.5.713
Levendosky, A. A., & Hopwood, C. J. (2017). Terminating supervision. Psychotherapy, 54(1), 37. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.10437/pst0000096
Mojtabai, R., & Olfson, M. (2010). National trends in psychotropic medication polypharmacy in office-based psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(1), 26-36. https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.175
Muniz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). International Test Commission guidelines for test translation and adaptation. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24
Olfson, M., & Pincus, H. A. (1994). Outpatient psychotherapy in the United States, I: Volume, costs, and user characteristics. The American journal of psychiatry, 151(9), 1289-1294.
Richards, P., & Bergin, A. E. (2014). Handbook of psychotherapy and religious diversity. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Sandín, B., Valiente, R. M., Chorot, P., Santed, M. A., & Lostao, L. (2008). SA-45: forma abreviada del SCL-90. Psicothema, 20(2), 290-297.
Titov, N., Dear, B. F., Ali, S., Zou, J. B., Lorian, C. N., Johnston, L., & Fogliati, V. J. (2015). Clinical and cost-effectiveness of therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for older adults with symptoms of depression: a randomized controlled trial. Behavior Therapy, 46(2), 193-205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2014.09.008
Valdivieso, S. (1994). Fundamentos y límites de la Psicoterapia. Boletín Escuela de Medicina, 23, 97-102. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1668-70272009000200006
Vallejo, M., Jordán, C., Díaz, M., Comeche, M. & Ortega, J. (2007). Psychological Assessment via the Internet: A Reliability and Validity Study of Online (vs Paper-and-Pencil) Versions of the General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28) and the Symptoms Check-List-90-Revised (SCL-90-R). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9(1), e2. doi: https://10.2196/jmir.9.1.e2
Von Bergen, A., & de la Parra, G. (2002). OQ-45.2, Outcome Questionnaire and evolution of Psychotherapy: Adaptation, Validation and Guidelines for its implementation and interpretation. Terapia Psicológica, 20, 161-176.
Weissman, M., & Cuijpers, P. (2017). Psychotherapy over the Last Four Decades. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 25(4), 155-158. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000165
Wood, W. D. (1982). An attempt to validate the psychoticism scale of the brief symptom inventory. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 55(4), 367–373. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1982.tb01521x
World Health Organization. (2015). World health statistics 2015. World Health Organization.
Publicado
2019-05-02
Cómo citar
DURAO, María et al. Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Síntomas Globales Online (ESGO). Ciencias Psicológicas, [S.l.], p. 95-105, may 2019. ISSN 1688-4221. Disponible en: <http://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/1812>. Fecha de acceso: 21 may 2019 doi: https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v13i1.1812.
Sección
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES